Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

THE SATANIC VERSES Q&A (10-12)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,443
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 15, 2009

Lovers of Salman Rushdie keep ignoring this lecture may be they are scared Rushdie's filth will be exposed and truth hurts, i feel sorry for the people who have bought his book and for people who supported him because it will make them look like fools too.

original title : How Rushdie Fooled the West

lecture by Sheikh Ahmed Deedat

Note : lecture is for true seekers only, people who want to know the truth and remember uncle Ahmed Deedat is reading from salman rushdie's book which has abusive language example racist, insulting, terrorism, abusive bigot, swearing, bully lingo, insulting white women, attacking all religions. It all was written by salman rushdie and he's the author of the book "satanic verse's".

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • rushdies going to hell. so who cares what he barks. its not gonna save him in his grave.

  • muslims are always crazy and hsve nothing in their hearts

  • @LiberdadeHedonista

    Good point - but I suspect that the reason for the reaction that rushdie got was that the majority of muslim extremists didnt understand what the book was about.

    Well, that and the innuendo that he created about Muhommad(Mahound) and his wives, who, were immitated by prostitutes in "the curtain". To me it is all in good fun though - especially when you look at the fatuous claims that Islam makes for itself. They shouldnt expect to be immune for criticism.

  • Rushdie surely is a genius --- but, in his stories, Muslims are always the heroes or the victims: even if they do something bad, it has a justification.

    I would expect Muslims to like Rushdie, since they are the good characters in his books, and Hindus to dislike him, since they are often the bad blokes.

    And yet, it is the contrary!

    Can it be that, in India, people prefer to be the story villains, so Muslims envy Hindus for getting that role in Sir Salman's novels?

  • @LiberdadeHedonista

    Oh.... you mean Osman the clown, in the chapter where they are told to go to mecca by Ayesha, who claims to be speaking on behalf of gibreel.

    I didnt think Osman was a child but the story of him being untouchable(that is, before he "converted" to islam to escape such opression). That story was a little sad alright.

    He is a great author though isnt he?

  • Saladin was unhappy in the English boarding school, and there was another boy, Osman, an "untouchable", who lived in the desert, together with his loving pet bullock, and was not allowed near wells of clean water.

    Rushdie always makes me weep with those stories about unfortunate children.

  • @LiberdadeHedonista

    Which of the two are you claiming goes through this ordeal in the book.

    Are you talking about Saladin, and his acception into the sufyan household when he started to look like a goat?

  • You are perhaps referring to the other little boy in the novel, the one from a Muslim family, who gets victimized in an English school. That is also a sad story.

  • restricted

  • @love187punk

    Not so.

    Mein Kampf is for sale in my local easons. Get your facts right.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more