Kagan Interpret
Top Comments
All Comments (11)
-
Thomas Jefferson on constitutional revision:
"I am certainly not an advocate for frequent and untried changes in laws and constitutions...But I know also, that laws ans institutions must go hand and hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths disclosed, and manners and opinions change with change of circumstances, institutions must advance also, and keep pace with the times."
-
The Constitution is defined by the Federalist Papers, oh dumb one. Sotomayor was bad, but this thing is WORSE! If the Democrats approve this Girl wonder, their party is DEAD.
-
Putting Kagan on the supreme court is treason! How could she screw up something a 5th grader understands.
-
Is that so? Kagan is a bloated, bovine bitch. I can't wait for her explaination for why the framers even bothered to include provisions for amending it. The Constitution isn't for nine monkeys in dresses to interpret. It means what it says. And, it is up to us to point that out and demand that our public serpents obey, without question, or else!
-
Kagan is wrong!!
NO!! The Constitution is to be followed NOT Interpreted !!
-
Kagan = Pure EVIL.
-
Wrong answer!
-
Kagan and Napolitano-----Sorta reminds me of two water buffaloes "in season" This woman is unqualified. The Supreme Court is far too important to turn it over to a bunch Obama Trolls, Flunkies and Droids. Don’t let him place someone like her on the court. Anti American, Anti-Gun Anti –Military NO! Time to announce plans to filibuster her allow her an opportunity to withdraw her name. Kagan the first Hobit to the SCOTUS and a LIAR.
She's twisting words around. Secure liberty now and in the future.
They weren't talking about "change," they were talking about liberty.
Filibuster her.
MooseOfReason 1 year ago 4
This should pretty much disqualify her, but we know it won't.
Teikiatsu 1 year ago 4