Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

9/11 Un-debunked Version 2.0: Buildings Built To Withstand Airplane Strikes

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
575 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (citizenfor911truth1)

  • Fail...All this vid shows is people trying to cover their reputations. The fact remains over 300 engineers, 1,200 civilian contractors and 240 Experts in demolition from 16 Countries agree this was not a "Controlled Demolition" and the collapse was in fact due to the planes hitting the Towers and the fires that resulted from it.

  • @BadBunnyRides

    Wrong. This video shows there were several pre-9/11 studies which showed that the Towers should have survived the impacts and the ensuing fires. And over 1200 architects and engineers agree the buildings should not have collapsed from the impacts too.

  • @citizenfor911truth1 That doesn't prove anything at all. The engineers who built the Twin Towers didn't have any idea that the Boeing 767 would be actually developed. Both towers COULD withstand an impact from a Boeing 707 going at 600 mph, but not a Boeing 767 or 757 going over 650 mph.

  • @SnickerFizz123

    "but not a Boeing 767 or 757 going over 650 mph." You need to double-check your figures. The official reports say that the planes that hit the buildings were travelling at 440 and 540 mph.

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (25)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @nb45001

    And independent ones.

  • @Audiodump yeah government ones

  • @nb45001

    They don't believe bush, they believe physicists and architects.

  • @mikebyrd42069 truthers may be retarded but bush beleivers are handicaped

  • @nb45001 Yeah!...Two 80 Ton ( that's 160,000 pounds ) ,fully fueled airplanes, traveling at over 500 MPH, wouldn't have done a thing to those buildings.

    ...oh wait, yes they did :P

  • @BadBunnyRides wrong

  • "truthers "are retarded

  • There wasn't a lot of experience with planes crashing into skyscrapers at the time the WTC was built. The designers didn't have a lot of real world data to go on when they conducted their studies. I think there was a little braggadocio in their claims that the towers could withstand plane crashes.

  • @citizenfor911truth1 Yeah, but the airframe of a Boeing 767 is actually stronger than that of a Boeing 707. If the Twin Towers were actually built to withstand a 767, they would still be standing in NYC.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more