Monte Carlo Fire Friday January 25 Las Vegas
Top Comments
All Comments (36)
-
Why does Silverman say " and so I said "pull it"
and later he said that he meant...pull out the fire dept...from the building..and then later they watched it fall.
There isnt any story of the fire dept saying that they had the authority to demolish building.
that would take hours!!! all day.
That may be a theory...but I was under the assumption it wasnt part of the OFFICIAL STORY>
It fell supossedly becasue of the fire...
-
strange how this building didnt collapse...
but building 7 did!!!
-
Joe Pechi stayed at the Stardust. No styrofoam Obama or Stucco in the building there.
-
I hope you enjoy my officer down video! we were at the tropicana when the fire hit!
-
yes i no, i had been trying to comment to fix for about 10 mins now and it seems to be broken.
maybe it's work now. i think it's 'cause you were responding at the same time.
7 was brought down by nyfd. (i am sure you new that)
-
wtc 7 WAS NOT HIT BY ANY PLANES but i am sure you knew that. 1 and 2 were hit by planes :)
-
'hold water from being afraid'
you shouldn't be afraid but concerned, especially since the wtc was crashed into by planes and no it didn't have styrofoam attached everywhere but the essentials for business on the inside that were flammable.
fyi, the alarms sounded that the issue was being investigated but then the investigation did not inform of the dangers of THE BUILDING IS ON FIRE!
-
no i don't work for mgm, lol, and believe it or not i am not a big fan of this material either but none of your arguments hold water so far i am afraid, you seem to be suggesting that vegas hotels are cheaply built, what does that make World Trade center 7 in NY so which fell due to fire???
fire alarms won't work where there is no fire or no smoke, in this case the rooms where there was no fire or smoke, fire alarms will now be installed on the outside of all hotels in the future
-
no, it's not the 1st case of this type of cheapness but still doesn't justify it because other places have it also or use it.
'sad fact?' what was the fact prior to the use of it? we can't go back to safer materials?
you must work for the mgm? why do you defend this so?
this was not a controlled burn and very easily could have gone awry. they were very fortunate that no one was injured. they didn't even have a fire alarm that worked properly.
-
how many fires does it take?
one is enough for me.
even though wood catches fire also, i'd rather use it because it isn't AS flammable as styrofoam.
fiberglass wasn't good enough for insulating?
wood, plaster, stucco isn't good enough for moldings?
i can drink out of styrofoam or have an ice chest from it but when my living quarters is built with it and hotels i frequent, it bothers me to an extent to know safety is bargained for.
ok.....video taping the TV is very LAME
ecidragon 4 years ago 3
thanx for posting soon as it happened
bluemancraig 4 years ago 3