Response to Ebilly99

Other Guys:

http://www.youtube.com/user/Thunderbolt94
http://www.youtube.com/user/DecKrash

We're responding to
http://www.youtube.com/user/Ebilly99

Also, we missed one, Sorry

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• Responding
• Problem
• of
• the
• Thunderbolt94
• Q (Star Trek)
• DecKrash
• Atheism
• Theism
• religion
• Evil
• cause
• all
• Theist
• Atheist
• Christian
• Christ
• Jesus
• War
• death
• Holocaust
• In
• The
• Name
• Of
• God
• Alarm
• Your
• Alien
• Sheep
• Shepherd
• Psalm
• 23
• Twenty-three
• eat
• meat
• lamb
• Response
• Bible
• Holy
• Spirit
• salvation
• Biblical
• Scholar
• Truth
• Free
• Will
• Logic
• Identity
• 1st
• Law
• Universe
• Gospel
• Thunderf00t
• determinism

[ebilly99]

@thunderbolt94 Wow coming from you I will take that dipshit as a badge of honer. You already said you would pay for my schooling, I wont make you pay anymore. Ok the Asinine Orthodox theroy. At least we agree with the last part, you blew your mind, just long before you ever met me. I mean I am only half sure you are being serious and the other half sure you are trolling me, as no one is that dumb. Yep I insulted you, and its about time.

[thunderbolt94]

@ebilly99

You don't even know what Logic is, dipshit! Have you actually taken a philosophy class? Have you taken critical thinking? I bet you a million dollars that I know more about philosophy (which Logic is a part of) than you do, so you shut your ignorant mouth. I answered your question, so go fuck yourself.

"to fill the gaps in you asinine theory"

My "theory" is the orthodox catholic understanding of original sin. Get over it, loser.

You are so incredibly stupid it blows my mind.

[ebilly99]

@thunderbolt94 Wait man stopped dieing. (Hey joe you better dig up uncle bob) You make claims without evidence, Create magical "Souls" to fill the gaps in you asinine theory and then claim I am moving goalpost? LEARN LOGIC.

[ebilly99]

@thunderbolt94 No logic, You said Original sin means one must have a soul. I asked when did man gain there soul. Why you running. I am not moving any goalpost, I am simply asking a question. You must define what a soul is or it is a meaningless word.

[thunderbolt94]

@ebilly99

"Convoluted much?"

Further evidence you have the intelligence of a retard. You only claim it's "convoluted" because you have have no understanding of the subject you speak of. Your comment is too stupid for a response. It REEKS of moving the goalpost. You tried to argue a contradiction between original sin and evolution, but NOW you say that it raises questions about the soul. My answer has nothing to do with the theology of the soul, only that their is no contradiction.

Idiot.

[ebilly99]

@thunderbolt94 WOW Convoluted much? When is man a man? The moment he uses a tool or understands death? If so the Gorilla is a living soul. How about when they can question existence? Then some of the mentally ill and baby's do not have souls. Homo-Neanderthal Soul or not?

[ebilly99]

@ebilly99 But you have asked me a lot of questions and insulted me the entire way, let me turn this on you. As a catholic you are aware that evolution is true, then from where did original sin come from. Was it Neanderthal man? The first creature that thought? How about Immaculate conception. Why was it necessary for a evolved creature? Without sin you have entire ideals are garbage.

[Randomicity912]

@ebilly99 Stop trying to delude yourself into thinking you know anything about Christianity. You have shit for brains.

[thunderbolt94]

@ebilly99

And you would still be the same uneducated fool even if you still were a Christian, especially considering you still hold to inaccurate and heretical views that cannot be traced within Church.

Do yourself a favor and pick up a book! It'll make you less ignorant and decrease the chances of you saying more stupid crap!

[ebilly99]

@thunderbolt94 Wow, If this is what I was like as a christian I am glad I left :P

[thunderbolt94]

@ebilly99

Your point does not remain, dum-dum. The anabaptists do not have apostolic succession, hence cannot trace their roots the original apostles, let alone are not the first church or followed the early church. The anabaptists did not exist until years and YEARS later right up until the Protestant reformation. And your failure to accurately represent the hypostatic union is a testament to your failure to understand Christian theology. You = Fail!

[thunderbolt94]

@ebilly99

I insult because you clearly have no idea what you're talking about and continue to regress in your willful ignorance on not only orthodox Christian theology, but also of church history. And no, you did not win you retard. You just quite simply are full of jack shit who has a fishing pole stuck up his ass.

[ebilly99]

@thunderbolt94 Ok Anabaptist followed the early church, not the first church. However my point remains.

[ebilly99]

@thunderbolt94 Insults... Again I have won as you can do nothing but insult me You look like a idiot. (Not calling you a idiot, just claiming you look like one)

[thunderbolt94]

@ebilly99

The sad fact remains that you are a deluded retard because claiming that the anabapstists were the first christians is like claiming that the Jehovah's witnesses or the Mormons were the first Christians. LMAO, loser.

Cite your sources. I can easily demonstrate to you that the anabaptists were not the first Christians. 

[thunderbolt94]

@ebilly99

No stupid. I've actually studied this issue. The anabaptists came straight from the PROTESTANT REFORMATION. That's a fact that you can easily look up in the scholarly papers.

No, I said that didn't address what I SAID, idiot.

LOL, once again promoting your bullshit assertion that anabaptists were the first Christians. BULL-FUCKING-SHIT, retard. Site your sources that they were.

You are clearly more retarded than a bag of rocks, dum-dum.

[ebilly99]

@thunderbolt94 Acording only to you. Even if every fact I said was false I would have won this if it were a debate as you have used ad homin attacks.

#2 I believe I answered your questions, what did I miss?

#3 Anabaptist were the first church. Organized under John, Then Jesus. They believed in baptism after salvation. This separates them from Catholics. If you want to call them something else so be it, however Jesus was a anabaptist :P

[thunderbolt94]

@ebilly99

You claimed that the anabaptists were the first Christians (demonstrably FALSE). You misrepresented Christian theology (hypostatic union AND omnipotence). You have done this with willful ignorance.

LOL, way to avoid my points. Doesn't address anything I said. I'm not angry. I'm just having fun with you because you obviously don't have a clue what you're talking about, especially when you claim anabaptists were the first Christians. ROFL

[thunderbolt94]

@ebilly99

1) You claimed that the anabaptists were the first Christians (demonstrably FALSE). You misrepresented Christian theology (hypostatic union AND omnipotence). You have done this with willful ignorance.

2) LOL, way to avoid my points. Doesn't address anything I said.

3) I'm not angry. I'm just having fun with you because you obviously don't have a clue what you're talking about, especially when you claim anabaptists were the first Christians. ROFL

[ebilly99]

@thunderbolt94 @thunderbolt94 Jesus was equal to the father and would not have left heaven unless he wanted to. He also had every chance to avoid the fate of death. According to your way of thinking Satan is = or greater then god? WOW. I always thought Satan was infinity weaker then god. Learn something new every day.

[ebilly99]

@thunderbolt94 What inaccurate things have been said. If I have said any and you can back it up then there is that.

The bible (OT) was not written down till captivity of the Jews in Babylon. Also Homer wrote the illide and the Odyssey so yeah.

Also Why is it I remain calm and you are so angry? Perhaps you should pray for Patience.