9/11 - Towers did NOT fall at free fall speed!

Proof to any reasonable person that the World Trade Center towers fell considerably slower than free fall speed.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 911
• 9/11
• september
• 11
• 11th
• conspiracy
• controlled
• demolition
• wtc
• world
• trade
• center
• explosives
• collapse
• debunk
• theories

[MrBourloto]

It doesn't matter what angle you watch the video from.

The building(s) was pulverized.

There 47 steel core columns with elevator shafts where pulverized.

3 buildings collapsed with 2 (so called planes).

Steel structure buildings do not eat planes aluminum planes.

If I take to a 747 Boeing with a sledge hammer. I can guarantee you that in 10 minutes that plane will never fly again.

Who the hell creates these videos. You MUST be in bed with the perpetrators.

YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELF.

[iamthejake2000]

@MrBourloto you ever been in bed with cheney?

he's amaaazzzzingzzz ;)

[pchatingliberal]

@danielklopp101 It took twice as long as free fall speed. I Think the point this video makes is that the "truth movement" is telling blatant lies and are not to be trusted.

[gtathug614]

Im surprised really, thousand's of people died in these buildings, and all you people give a flying /FUCK/ about is how they fell. Why DO people give two flying /FUCKS/ about how the building fell? Honestly, i'd think the people are more important more then how the hell the building's fell, honestly.

[ThePBass]

The 9 seconds came from the official NIST report. This is not something conspiracy theorists pulled out of their ass.

[uncleball78]

Watch "Controlled Building Demolition - Detroit " A much smaller building where the debris ejected outside the building fell faster then the core of the building. It says it is a "controlled demolition", but it must be the work of terrorist because the core didn't fall as fast as the debris ejected outside the building.

[MazJax]

@Toranaga89 I didn't remove shit. What's so hard to understand that an object in the air in freefall like the falling debris fell much faster than something with 100 floors of tower under it?

[Toranaga89]

@MazJax You removed the comment where I did the calculations. Air friction is important even for such dense objects, most because the friction force gets higher with the velocity of the object moving. What I say is that 2 seconds of difference between a FREE FALL equation WITH NO FRICTION AT ALL is WAY TOO MUCH for a building to collapse on itself without a demolition process acting on it. And you must admit that something that is simply "crushing" should do MUCH MORE resistance than air or void

[TimReed22222]

@chucky34220 "Problem is that something that has never happened happened 3 times on the same day."

Why do you think that's significant? Do you find it hard to believe that 2 planes were crashed into 2 towers on the same day? Was that a coincidence? No, it was a plan!

"The fires were not very hot in the towers."

This is incorrect; the fires were est. to be 1800°F or higher - that's pretty hot! The black-smoke-means-cool-fire tidbit applies to WOOD fires, not the towers.

[shananagans5]

@chucky34220 Also look up velocity&energy. Apply that to the aircraft, you will see how much of a shock the buildings took. That also quickly explains how they fell once the collapse started. Buildings that size don't have a great safety margin built in. They were pushing the limits with the Trade canters especially when they were built

Energy=MassxVelocity squared. That makes it perfectly clear why the tops came down like a hammer. Do your own math,don't take the conspiracy nuts opinions on it

[shananagans5]

@chucky34220 The structural damage was the main reason they fell. The fire helped. You don't need to melt steel to weaken it notably. Also, beams get most or their strength from their shape so even slightly bent beams were drastically weakened. On building 7. Half of it was gone from debris falling 0n it. The conspiracy nuts never mention that. They just show the good side of the building & say it was undamaged. That's BS the other side was gutted.