Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Carbon Trading Scheme Explained

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,517
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 4, 2008

Kevin Rudd & the Labor Government have announced that Australia will be bringing in a Carbon Trading Scheme.
Information on what a Carbon Trading Scheme is & how it works?

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (SentientSight)

  • You global warming is actually REAL, but this Carbon Trading Scheme is a scam.

    Please try to avoid confusing the two.

  • I'm glad that you see this Carbon tax is a scam.

    If you can provide me any evidence that Carbon the element that all life on earth is based upon, and Oxygen the element that all life on earth needs to live, when combined to form Carbon Dioxide becomes a life threatening catasrophe to earth, I'm all ears.

    Carbon Dioxide levels were much higher in the past than the worst estimates are for global warming, ergo the theory is false.

Top Comments

  • carbon tax... australia says no

  • think of it the same way big buisness did,

    they simply did a bad burn during their base measurement period

    [the equivelent to running your car on full choke to get the highest reading possable

    then after you get the credit go back to normal running[and sell the extra carbon credits to the bank [or get loans on the credit]

    we are talking about a new CREDIT[ie money]

    and a new tax,designed purely to boost big buisness income and their bonus

    carbon credit should flow to people then to buisnes

see all

All Comments (63)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Images and video clips can be deceiving. The white smoke from the giant towers is merely water vapor, also known as H2O, not CO2 the greenhouse gas, because the towers are cooling towers used for heat exchange only.

  • Australia has already found a way to combat criticism of its new carbon scheme set to be implemented in July 2012. All Labor politicians have been instructed to "read from the script" when it comes to its carbon scheme. For instance they say "carbon price" versus "carbon tax" and also "climate change" versus "global warming". Also Blythe Masters, as head of Global Commodities at JP Morgan was not concerned about "saving the planet" when she designed using carbon as a derivative.

  • WHAT a load of CRAP

  • @splintercell99 India also opposes Carbon Tax.

  • Nice video, but the comments in between are too ridiculous to even comment on? You don't understand anything about Enron trading bandwidth, you jammer on about a world government of Finance and that carbon trading is creating a new financial system. Do some research into the core theoretical underpinnings of all these things and you woud understand that everything you're saying is utter bullcrap.

  • @jappud Rather than looking at half truths in cointelpro look at " A Logical Argument Against Man Made Global Warming for the Layman " climate changes YES, but global warming is not caused by man, man couldn't change the climate driving temps up nor down either way even if he tried . But he is trying yes ?,one only has to look up at those white lines in the sky & what they turn into YES?. HM this is your man made climate change that has absolutely nothing to do with Co2  /watch?v=GvhVoRtjhiA

  • @jappud Of course climate change is real,It changes 4 times a year .Its called the seasons . i will listen to your video simply because I look at all information. Indeed you have read the Copenhagen treaty haven't you , If you did its quite clear they were attempting to set up world governance , or haven't you cross referenced your information ?

  • @jappud Do you really think you are grasping something that the climate scientists are unaware of? "Plant more trees = MORE CO2 fact." **sigh**

    --

    I'm afraid your link is dead ?

    Kyoto = plant more trees YES? So how do we account for the amounts of co2 thats emitted from trees ? According to Kyoto this fact is ignored YES /NO ? plants & trees grow better in Co2 abundance do they not ? So how do you think CO2 gets up to the greenhouse ? Do tell Is it from power stations or oceans ?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more