Angled cut column explained.

Let's move on to some real evidence.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11
• thermite
• thermate
• steel
• molten
• twin
• towers
• ground
• zero

[graybus]

Ok, fine, so somebody cut through it with a torch. What about the other mass of evidence

[poshuajerkins]

but how would a cutter get good ground to stand on? it looks from the pic that there is no where to stand and level yourself. also it looks like it's shortly after 9/11 since the ground is still smoking. thoughts anyone?

[cwehden]

A building collapsing because of fire can't eject huge amounts of debris horizontally 100's of meters! The official story is A JOKE.

[Kovarr]

You cut beams like that, on an angle, to control the direction they fall, as well as the direction the slag will run. My friend took a welder's course. This was the result of people removing damaged beams, not cutting before the impact.

[gunthaarz]

as if the angle cut was the only evidence, when you're standing in the worlds biggest pile of massive steel H beams _everywhere_ ALL mangled up like only so much boiled spaghetti. Pretending all the abnormal deformations around you came from a "pancake collapse! By now you'd have to be a blithering IDIOT not to understand neither basic laws of physics OR what you have right in front of you.

[NorCalTruth]

nice video!



[TheMKMonarch]

Clearly the North Tower core, somewhere at the basement or main lobby levels. Because of the thickness of the columns.

[infoseeker264]

I think its terrible that someone has to use this as evidence of Controlled Demolition when there is plenty other evidence to prove that. If the towers truly collapsed because the floor trussed weaken and collapsed to the next floor down, How did the Massive Core Columns collapse. If the building collapsed like they say, the CORE would still be standing.

[MoJoSB]

This is a very good video and something those who really care about what happen that day should take note of.

People have to be very careful what they present as evidence and how it's presented. It's one of the reason I hate sideshows like Alex Jones and his ilk, they only make things harder for all.

Same with those who speak of no planes, nukes, cgi planes, or whatever other stuff that I'm sure is FUN to contemplate but weakens the people out there doing the REAL science on this.

[stratocaster539]

this still doesn't explain why cutting should be done at an angle when there are so many straight cuts at the site.there is photographic evidence of members of the fire team on the same day looking the same way walking from the site, perhaps those pics need to be found, they were taken on 9/11.Also it looks like the virgin rubble site before heavy machinery was added.The site still looks 'choked' to me.