Battlefield bad company 2 (AMD Phenom ll X6 1055t + GTX 465) 1080p
Uploader Comments (HazemHead)
Top Comments
-
@BrokenSF if there wasn't for AMD , 60% of the PC gamers would be on consoles , because most people don't have 500$ to spend on Intel processor.
All Comments (48)
-
@HazemHead pfft amd for 3d programs? LAME... have you even tried intel?
-
@gazzxr - haha...The i2500k is cheaper than the recently released crap they call Bulldozer and smokes it in most every application. Intel offers choices, low end, mid level and high end. The only reason anyone would ever choose an AMD processor is because of brand loyalty,its certainly not because of performance.
-
my eyes burnts
-
@sami10331 Pentium quad core? o_O
-
@HazemHead Do you know if XFX Radeon 6870 Is better than the 465 GTX?
-
@mystuff3040 Read my comment again.
-
@gazzxr Entirely wrong, 80% of all cpu's are from Intel, check the Steam stats.
Also, 500$ can't even buy you the graphics card, how are you supposed to get an entire pc for 500$?
-
right i was wondering would bc2 run on max with this?
AMD Phenom 2 x4 955 3.2ghz ( I THINK)
Saphire HD radeon 6770 ?
600w power supply :)
-
@mrinsanegamer101 but the funny thing is that it just says X6 1055T not phenom II ?!?!?
hey is battlefield gonna start on my computer :
Pentium Quad-Core 2.8 GHz
2 GB Ram
Sapphire HD5670 1GB DDR5??
On win 7 ??
sami10331 1 year ago
@sami10331 Yes
to make sure go to Google > Can you run it?
HazemHead 1 year ago 2
Respond to this video... are u gonna get MoH?
Nabs07 1 year ago
@Nabs07 Not really, bfbc2 is much better in my opinion
I've 21'inch screen
HazemHead 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
AMD Phenom ll X6 !!!!
are you kidding me ?
intel core i7 is better .. AMD is shit
but nice video card .. GTX 265
BrokenSF 1 year ago
@BrokenSF Do not compare AMD with Intel on games.
They all run high games very well, but if you say with 3D programs
such as rendering. I'd say AMD, that's my choice.
+ its GTX 465 not 265 =,="
HazemHead 1 year ago 12