KEN HAM IS AN IDIOT part 1B of 3 (or 4)

Ken Ham has claimed that belif in Evolution leads to Racism and Homosexuality, so I decided to do an entire 3 part series debunking that once sentence (but then part 1 was too long so I had to split part 1 into 2 parts)

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Ken
• Ham
• Racism
• Homosexuality

[GoldenWeeks1981]

Both Lenin and Stalin did use a kind of racism to single out groups that opposed them.

[dechha1981]

actually, they used anti-intelectualism.

[MarkArandjus]

Who are the interesting two fellas at 4:23 :D?

Shaw and John, they're like caricatures x)

[dechha1981]

Not sure, all I know is I found them when I did a Google image search for "Inbreeding".

[Albval1711]

Ken Ham is a tremendous intellect. Science is on his side.

[dechha1981]

He claims that Evolution leads to Racism and then he uses Religion to say that you shouldn't marry outside of your "People Group" which is his word for Race.

[theinquisitor]

It's bizarre, because evolution is what has shown us that all human races have a common origin, and that all species have a common origin. It is an idea that unites us as one biosphere, one planet. The idea that such a thing would cause division is just backwards.

[jhbbunch]

Kind of weird how slavery exists for thousands of years. And then doesn't last much past a decade or two after Darwin's book 'On the Origin of Species' is published.

[Timbrock1000]

@theinquisitor Good point. Most races developed from environmental as well as genetic and geographical issues. For example, the Japanese people (of Japanese islands) originated from mainland Asia. After crossing the gulf seperating the islands from the mainland, then prohibiting anyone to leave or any outsiders from coming in, thus isolating themselves, they limited the genetic characteristics that would be passed on to their children, thus bringing about the Japanese race of today.

[scottsteele13]

thankU I'm not going to comment or ask questions regarding any of your statements at this time. I appreciate the direction to study the Super Group. by the way-I personally believe claims from witnesses stating they've apparently seen Big-Foot or extraterrestrial travelers to be the result of psychosocial conditioning, interest in seeking personal attention, sometimes the unfortunate result of mental disorder/drugs; with today's technology we should have convincing evidence if they existed now

[gregrutz]

@scottsteele13 They date crystals that they know do not form with lead in them.

They get a date of 4,545 Million years, + or - 2 million years.

They knew the earth was millions of years of before radiometric dating was invented.

Study the Super Group at the bottom of the Grand Canyon

They have never found a human fossil with a dinosaur fossil.

[gregrutz]

@scottsteele13 claims to seeing living creatures that we could identify as any of the dinosaurs

People see Big Foot and Aleins too. Does that prove they exist?

Why did dinosaurs stop making fossils 65 million years ago?

Why did 60% of all life on earth die off 65 million yrs ago in the last of 6 major mass extinctions?

Missing or multiple tree rings are easy to see and work around. Different dating methods are used and the crosscheck each other.

Geologists knew the earth was old yrs. ago

[scottsteele13]

multiple tree rings to develop within a year. Lastly what methods do we use to date the planet, how are the falsifiably demonstrated to be accurate and repeatably demonstrable to attain an accurate and true date for the existence of the earth. I appreciate your time and reply.

[scottsteele13]

i appreciate your reply. how do we know these things are false and proven wrong. for instance, in all historical writings are there any claims to seeing living creatures that we could identify as any of the dinosaurs and are there any fossils that show human bones, footprints, tools, etc. coexisting with dinosaurs or before any dinosaurs? also, as someone with a history working as a logger/tree trimmer i am aware that sometimes weather trends don't allow growth rings, or cause multiple rings

[gregrutz]

@scottsteele13 Truth >>There are over 250,000 peer-reviewed scientific studies on evolution, with full support from every related life science, including genetics. There has not been a single falsification to refute evolution in 150 years of relentless scrutiny!

It is the backbone of Biology, accepted by all scientists.

[gregrutz]

@scottsteele13 watch?v=weLmk-E167U

Kent says dinosaurs lived with man, false.

Kent says tree rings can't be counted, false.

Kent says the earth is 6000 years old and there was a flood 4400 years ago, both proven wrong.

[scottsteele13]

to all: please use factual statements to support your opinions and claims; without the empty rhetoric. When making claims to truth, there's no good reason to believe one's claims when they're without evidence and clearly-stated information that demonstrates the point, rather than utilizing slander directed toward those that express opposing viewpoints; with the possible goal of quieting opponents based only on social influence.

[scottsteele13]

@gregrutz what's a specific lie that he's said? what's the statement and do you also know where i can find it? i appreciate your help.