Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

THE SUPER-EFFICIENT ENGINE (PART 2)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
67,908
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 29, 2008

Please watch also, THE SUPER-EFFICIENT ENGINE ( Part 3).


VIDEO ABOVE: actual weight of the bigger gear is 3/4 kg & being driven by a small gear at approximately 3000 RPM.

For the PURPOSE OF SHOWING THE AMOUNT OF VIBRATION the mechanism has no balancer.

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (died4hislove)

  • Please watch also, THE SUPER-EFFICIENT ENGINE ( Part 3).

Top Comments

  • high performance vibrator :D

  • it is a gear nothing more, its not your idea, its over 100 years old, a crankshaft is the most efficant way to transmit power from a piston to rotation. this is 10% to 20% less efficant then a stanard crank shaft. 2nd just because you think its better does not mean it is. you cant just say its 50% more efficant on gas, its not, you are a lier a cheat and a theif. its opsolete. and if you did try to use it in an engine it would work for 30 sec b4 the force at the end stroke rips the pinion off!

Video Responses

This video is a response to Pixar Cars Scene - Get Through That McQueen
see all

All Comments (193)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Let me invent a stupid device, call it "The [First & Last Name] Engine", create a wikipedia page about it, and throw around statistics and the words efficiency and new technology!

  • Your title is misleading. You misspelled the word "inefficient."

  • Somebody might benefit from adoption of the KISS principle.. You're halfway there already; Now it's time to take it all the way!

    { Keep It Simple and} **Stupid**

  • @thepeoplesamaricuh -contpart2-

    so this is over 100yrs old invented by someone else, and it was proven even then how inefficient it was. and all it takes is 5 to 10 minutes to look up facts, and a want to improves ones self, which trolls just dont ever seem to want to do. and as for my user name....HA HA HA HA next time you troll try useing something of relevance instead of your jealousy of usernames and other ppls quotes. nothing is funnier then a fail troll..HA HA HA HA

  • @thepeoplesamaricuh HA HA HA... wow why not try reading what i post. i never said anything about a "fly wheel" in any of my post, now others have tho, but not me. and as for the trolling lets see, i dont call anyone names, I dont insult anyone, I use facts that can be backed up by anyone that can use a search engine, or has completed the 5th grade. and this "innovation" was just that when it was first patentes over 100 yrs ago for this "intended use", -cont-

  • @1crazyfocker well first of all your nonsense about it driving a fly wheel is crap because this would probably driving a fly wheel any way. second gears have been invented but this guy patented this intended use therefore it is still a great innovation. and i am currently designing my own engine and know for a fact that your big fat trolling as has no proof especially since the only username you could think of was 1crazyfocker! try being a bit more respectable next time idiot.

  • @macatac234 I am one of the very few inventors who manufacture his own inventions (Wolfhart Industries). I invented and developed the first clear water hydraulic motor or first oil-free high pressure pump. I never claimed it is an “engine”.

    I will congratulate you as soon you invention comes to the market, but as long this is not the case you should be a little more cautious. Only idiots use foul language and diffamations.

    By the way: I talked to another user

  • @InventorWillimczik

    mate you're a fricken idiot! this will never work as an engine! i.e. a device that will do rotational/mechanical work/produce any power via an output shaft! it may work as a pump! but that is not an engine! get it right. also your wrong in pretty much every comment you've written on this video...stick to lego technic buddy!

  • The gear looks like its going so fast its skipping teeth, wouldn't this have an effect on combustion, timing as well as efficiency? This engine while unique does look far from super efficient, but keep working on it Mabye you'll improve it.O_o

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more