If two people of faith believe two opposite things, how do you determine who is right. Only through reality can we determine what really is true. So who not start with reality in the first place?
@ZebraNinja Science is based on proving things and further refining knowledge. Things constantly prove wrong in science and are then proved right or changed, this is how science evolves and how we learn more about the world around us.
@ZebraNinja Look I'm sure there's actual questions that can't be answered by science but can be answered by religion (why were here or something) but the formation of the earth and solar system (and subsequently the energy involved) is easily explained and I'm pretty sure you learn it at GCSE level so please don't propose easily answered scientific questions that you haven't even taken the time to research in order to promote certain religions. Please do your research so you don't look stupid!
@juker606 No, realist's do not worship any deities because there is no consistent proof that one exists. Also just a note, you can have religion's that do not worship a god or deities, an example of this is Buddhism.
@Scyeth if that's the case then i would say he is more of an idealist than religious and using the term religion is more so pretense if for attention. maybe the church of idealism would have been better of a name. religion without a deity or deities seems pointless to me but i guess that could be a matter of opinion. but either way anyone who posts here must care about this to some level.
@juker606 I guess the religion bit is just to gather attention, and since it's a religion, it's got to have Gods or deities right? So they just chose ones that were based on science and reality :\ who cares
Religion is a good thing for good people and a bad thing for bad people.
H. Richard Niebuhr
MrBiblecontradiction 7 months ago
stoned as bro!!!! lol
MrSlik777 7 months ago
@ZebraNinja Science is based on proving things and further refining knowledge. Things constantly prove wrong in science and are then proved right or changed, this is how science evolves and how we learn more about the world around us.
zbrooo 9 months ago
@ZebraNinja Look I'm sure there's actual questions that can't be answered by science but can be answered by religion (why were here or something) but the formation of the earth and solar system (and subsequently the energy involved) is easily explained and I'm pretty sure you learn it at GCSE level so please don't propose easily answered scientific questions that you haven't even taken the time to research in order to promote certain religions. Please do your research so you don't look stupid!
zbrooo 9 months ago
@Scyeth The flying spaghetti monster definitely exists and I've never met someone who doesn't believe in it.
zbrooo 9 months ago
@juker606 No, realist's do not worship any deities because there is no consistent proof that one exists. Also just a note, you can have religion's that do not worship a god or deities, an example of this is Buddhism.
zbrooo 9 months ago
@Scyeth blah
juker606 9 months ago
@juker606 meh
Scyeth 9 months ago
@Scyeth if that's the case then i would say he is more of an idealist than religious and using the term religion is more so pretense if for attention. maybe the church of idealism would have been better of a name. religion without a deity or deities seems pointless to me but i guess that could be a matter of opinion. but either way anyone who posts here must care about this to some level.
juker606 9 months ago
@juker606 I guess the religion bit is just to gather attention, and since it's a religion, it's got to have Gods or deities right? So they just chose ones that were based on science and reality :\ who cares
Scyeth 9 months ago