Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

A New Energy Source - Blacklight Power

Hey everybody, this is history in making ... Rowan University replicates BlackLight's new hydrogen-based energy source. The BlackLight Process generates more than 200 times the energy of burning...  
 
Customize

More From: ifreed0m

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
This is a video response to Blacklight Power on CNN 12/12/2008
46 ratings
Sign in to rate
25,575 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (1)

Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (76)   Options

Loading...
darkultra (2 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Weren't there solar panels on the white house, or a nearby government house, in Washingon DC for a while? They removed them, probably because of a oil-friendly administration. I guess a democracy is as good as its voters, and if the voters are religious and less educated then the average on europe, good things doesn't happen. Why care about the environment if you wait for rapture, and why help hunger when there supposedly is a God's plan behind all this? Baka.
dmix09 (2 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Precisely.

I laughed at your "Baka", lol that was appropriate. =)
TommyPrimate (2 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
this (in the video) is all well and good, but what is their magical chemicals and what is the energy cost of there production? and you are right, over a kilogram of material for 280 watts. I bet you couldn't start your car with that.
grosquipue (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 -2
Marked as spam
These guys are very smart: they managed to produce 60 million dollars worth of bullshit. Even those 2 scientists who claimed they achieved nuclear fusion in a jar could not raise that much money.
fsjal1 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
too much energy is lost during the distribution process. avoiding producing energy in a common place sounds logical.
iceee187 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
One more thing. Isnt a kilograme=2.2lbs . Thats for a light bulb for 7 hours he is sayin. If that's correct. That sounds crappy.
bluehorse888 (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
how much does the hoover dam weigh?
iceee187 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Whats up with MIT. Number one in engineering schools and I hear nothing about them. At least on the level I'm looking for. ?.?
potheadpenguin (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
For once, an energy solution on youtube which isn't bullshit (ie magnetic generator free energy designs). I found out about this a few years ago and I'm really interested as it gives the possibility of using water for fuel.
QuarkToo (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
It does not violate the 2nd law. All free energy devices do only one thing - they convert mass into the atomic energy contained within the mass. The energy level is so high, you cannot measure the tiny amount of mass that is missing.

An accelerator is key to causing that reaction. I know how most free energy devices work and they all just do that conversion a variety of different ways.

Tesla, Puharich and Meyer made ozone using an accelerator and mixed with water vapor for H2o2 - it sheers.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.