Fighter Jet UFO Footage: The Real Deal ???
Top Comments
All Comments (37)
-
@fairhillnorrie they can't they've already tried in battle for L.A
-
why not shoot one down and then we will see...
-
@OtisButler why did the radar lock onto it??? come on bug guts boy
-
I cannot speak German, just as you cannot speak English. So an exchange in that language would be similairly if not more futile.
Is there a German equivalent for the word "hypocrite"?
I suggest you reference it then try to comperehend why the credibility of your first paragraph- feeble though it may be at best- is eviscerated by the second.
-
williamwilson666, we can change to German if you prefered it.
However neither empty words, nor theatralic ad hominem attacks nor rhetorics can circumvent the proof (or even an evidence) with that you have to come forward, since you advocate a particular hypothesis.
Illwindrunner is a well known missionary of the ET-cult, who litters many YT-sites with his quotes. So I don't take him for more serious than a scientology follower, who quotes from L. Ron Hubbard's 'Dianetics' book.
;-))
-
I will not engage you further as you are unable to distinguish between both evidence and proof, purely on a semantic level is sufficient to convince me your ignorance and disingenuity prohibits worthwhile discussion. I will just refer you to my original posts and ask that you- a little more honestly- comprehend both its content and implications.
It is you, not I, that appears muddled.
I also suggest you would do well to refer to the above and below quotes from
lllwindrunner.
-
williamwilson666, somehow, you mix up things thoroughly: The link between a hypothesis (or probability, if you want) and a fact is termed proof (or evidence). As somebody, who claims or advocates a particular hypothesis, the burden of proof is on you. Until know, I've read from you an overwhelming amount of empty words - but I haven't seen yet a tangible proof for alien visitation from you. I am humble. One single proof were enough for me.
;-))
-
There is a wealth of evidence already available,though I can't decypher the pidgin-English of the rest of your post so that will have to remain unanswered.
I suggest, if you are actually interested- and i doubt you are beyond ignorant adolescent cynicism- there are multifarious examples of what on balance of probability are either extra-terrestrial, dimensional or temporal craft in our atmosphere if you are willing to do some work. Research is the only remedy, I'm afraid- and that is up to you.
"The evidence that there are objects which have been seen in our atmosphere, and even on terra firma, that cannot be accounted for either as man-made objects or as any physical force or effect known to our scientists, seems to me to be overwhelming... A very large number of sightings have been vouched for by persons whose credentials seem to me unimpeachable."
~ Lord Hill-Norton, Chief of Defense Staff, Ministry of Defense, U.K., 1973
lllwindrunner 2 years ago 4
"The negative claims of pseudo-skeptics who offer facile explanations must themselves be subject to criticism. If a competent witness reports having seen something tens of degrees of arc in size (as happens) and the scoffer, who of course was not there -- offers Venus or a high altitude weather balloon as an explanation, the requirement of extraordinary proof for an extraordinary claim falls on the proffered negative claim as well."
~ Bernard Haisch, Astrophysicist.
lllwindrunner 2 years ago 3