Moon Landing

On the 40th anniversary of the Moon Landings National Geographic TV will reveal the untold stories and the make-or-break moments of the most dangerous expedition in history. http://www.natgeotv.com

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

• moon landing
• moonwalking
• moon walking
• panda
• furby
• hilarious
• national geographic
• tv
• funny

[x0danibabyx0]

0:12 man getting out of a blinking purple panda!!

[JamaicaGold1]

@marshalllucky uuhhh I'm afraid the ship never reached that far into the magnetic field. The moon is located between the inner and outer belts. The inner belt is not even powerful enough to interfere with our communication satellites. The dangers offered by the outer van halen belt were easily circumvented using the Faraday principles. You're a little behind on your physics.

[marshalllucky]

the moone landing did no happen, the van halen belt would have kell the astronats, if they went moon how come thare is no evidents after all thees year, you shouls read up about these hoax

[Narek456]

wtf  lol

[KnightChatX]

@smidoid I totally agree with you on this part. And don't mind these guys they are sameones doing the same exact thing on my video too Ironic. These guys like to fight, insult, and argue more than have reasonable discussion. We all know 1+ 1 = 2 but to them it's 84 and nothing will convince them otherwise so you know where that conversation goes.

[0Mensa0Euclid0Fan0]

Dear smidoid, will you kindly shut up. You are not truly ignorant of the fact that someone can be ugly simply by the way they are acting are you? You seem to be completely delusional. How you can argue there would be no delay under any circumstances totally boggles the mind. Frank, as misguided as he may indeed be is just making a huge fool of you sir. There are plenty of examples of unedited footage. And by what you've said you have seen some. Are you trying to make non hoax believers look bad?

[smidoid]

2.5 seconds is the round trip time. HOWEVER. If we hear the reply from moon first and then control answer, there is NO delay at all. For instance.

Moon to NASA: "The Eagle has landed"

NASA to LEM: "Roger that, the eagle has landed"

NO perceptible delay. LEM's *reply* would take 2.5s to get back, of course.

BUT this is academic.

Yet, I haven't HEARD a scrap of evidence. You sound like an ignorant creationist citing evidence that you can't produce.

NOW POST REAL EVIDENCE SOME OR SHUT IT!

[smidoid]

Not agreeing with someone does not make them ugly; unless your command of the language is too limited to find a better word. There isn't room on this "board" to explain the errors in your reasoning, either.

Once again, you're making statements without backing them up - the onus is on you to post the unedited tape. 10 minutes of original, unexpurgated material would be more than enough.

If it exists.

[frankensteinmoneymac]

Oh I forgot to finish my first thought...You state I used straw men and ad hominen arguements......Which I dont agree with but I wont argue that. What you said was that i was confusing the 2.....which I do not.. Also I just realized....YOUVE SEEN THE EVIDENCE IVE GIVEN YOURSELF You state that the rec. should only have 1:25 delay (which I proved wrong) & you state that they do indeed have such a delay and sound stilted. HOW DO YOU KNOW U said the tapes "dont exist" after all LOL

[frankensteinmoneymac]

Ok.....so youve showed Ive supposedly used ad hominem and straw men...even thought I dont agree (by the way I did not mean that you where literaly looking ugly! only that the way you were acting was ugly!! I thought that was obvious. The evidence has been easy to find the whole time. I could find a clip but I dont think a 20 sec clip would be very convincing. Unless you want me to copy hours of footage and send it to you I suggest you go to the library! That is exactly what I did to verify this