Eisenman is right, inscriptions are highly formulaic. To say "X brother of Y" is highly suspicious. The inscription was forged for a 21st-century audience.
Eisenman's Argument failed. His only motivation for making these videos is the fact that both his life's work & the atheists arguments have just unraveled. In a court of law the James Ossuary has been confirmed. The case is closed by the scientific experts. Now Eisenman, bible skeptics, and their followers are left dumfounded of the fact that Jesus truly existed, lived, died and rose from the dead. Eisenmen's failure grows as he now substitutes discredited gnostic writings as his evidence. LOL!
Eisenman is right, inscriptions are highly formulaic. To say "X brother of Y" is highly suspicious. The inscription was forged for a 21st-century audience.
Camerinus 8 months ago
Eisenman's Argument failed. His only motivation for making these videos is the fact that both his life's work & the atheists arguments have just unraveled. In a court of law the James Ossuary has been confirmed. The case is closed by the scientific experts. Now Eisenman, bible skeptics, and their followers are left dumfounded of the fact that Jesus truly existed, lived, died and rose from the dead. Eisenmen's failure grows as he now substitutes discredited gnostic writings as his evidence. LOL!
prffsrx 8 months ago