Eisenman on the James Ossuary 1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
648 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 3, 2010

Eisenman on the James Ossuary
Naked Archaeologist
Toronto, Canada
Oct. 20, 2002

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (2)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Eisenman is right, inscriptions are highly formulaic. To say "X brother of Y" is highly suspicious. The inscription was forged for a 21st-century audience.

  • Eisenman's Argument failed. His only motivation for making these videos is the fact that both his life's work & the atheists arguments have just unraveled. In a court of law the James Ossuary has been confirmed. The case is closed by the scientific experts. Now Eisenman, bible skeptics, and their followers are left dumfounded of the fact that Jesus truly existed, lived, died and rose from the dead. Eisenmen's failure grows as he now substitutes discredited gnostic writings as his evidence. LOL!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more