MoonFaker: Shifting Stars. PART 2

http://www.moonmovie.com
http://www.billkaysing.com
http://www.ralphrene.com
http://www.moonhoax.us

A follow up to "MoonFaker: Dude, Where's My Star"


Jarrah White would like to invite you to see the Apollo 11 footage that Svector, Phantom Wolf and Shane Killian have tried to suppress from public view.

APOLLO XI: THE LITTLE GEM
http://moonhoax.us/littlegem.htm

See also the evidence of faked and suppressed Apollo 10 footage that Mark Gray doesn't want you to see.

FLAGGING THE GEMS
http://moonhoax.us/flagginggems.htm

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• MoonFaker
• Stars
• Venus
• Apollo
• 14
• 16
• John
• Young
• Alan
• Shepard
• Bill
• Kaysing
• Celestia
• Jarrah
• White
• JW
• Studios

[LunarTuner]

It would have been nice if you had done the experiment correctly. It also would have been nice if you remembered that youtube compresses to the point that we can barely see whatever it is you think you found.

Clearly the LP image has dirt and crap all over it! Your own negative emboss shows that. How convenient that a dirty scan and a star look similar? Did you think to use Celestia to identify any of the dust?

[WhiteJarrah]

"Did you think to use Celestia to identify any of the dust?"

Yes I did.

watch ? v = fdWi5ueVgSs

BTW, your friend from the National Space Society was very insistant that they were stars.

BTW, seeing as you are still with us, I retracted my original Mythbusters response video nearly a month ago - kindly retract your video.

[SirMildredPierce]

I wonder why you only chose two of the Venus photos when there are nine of them to choose from, and strangely other people have been able to get them to match up.

That you have failed to do so has some how been translated in to evidence that the Venus photos are fake.

Sorry Jarrah, evidence doesn't work that way. Check out photo 9193 in the series, they even managed to fake the slight motion blur evident in the rest of the picture! Brilliant these fakers!

[WhiteJarrah]

"I wonder why you only chose two of the Venus photos when there are nine of them to choose from, and strangely other people have been able to get them to match up."

I focused on the first two because they are the most prominent ones used, and I have proved that those positions are false: they were not taken at Fra Mauro on Feb 6th 1971 at 12:07pm as is claimed by the ALSJ.

[SirMildredPierce]

As far as "afewgoodclips" video, I've never been convinced that what we are looking at is stars in those pictures. 1. they don't look like any known stars I know of. 2. the overall quality of the print is poor and so I think we have to conclude we are seeing dust. I mean doesn't he point out dust in one of the pictures in the crater? I don't buy it.

[WhiteJarrah]

"1. they don't look like any known stars I know of."

Your friend wspaceport was sure as hell that they were stars, and often harassed me to comment on them.

[eastshawnee]

Jarrah, first of all, thanks for doing this, and hanging in there through the harassment. I tend to think the government is the one pushing the aliens on the moon theory, to get people to be associated with the looney fringe if they question the official position. What's your take on this? I think the same is true for the 9/11 "hologram" theory. That they push it to seem like it is "space beam" craziness. They are always trying to attach it to my CGI evidence.

[kitsunechan90]

@kitsunechan90 I also failed to mention about the earth changing a smidge as well in the 2nd photo. Coming from a 3D animation artist. You can easily recreate the pictures, because it was not the same camera angle.

[kitsunechan90]

The Moon venus earth thingy is off. You forgot to mention in the 2nd photo how the Apollo moves to the left and is tilted just a smidge showing a different angle which is why both pictures dont match up.... Im not impressed. Moon landing was real, and Im bored now. Good day to u sir.

[garhwalijoshi]

Excellent work Jarrah, keep up the great work. We are with you.

[statikregimen]

Sry to double post, but also want to give kudos for your efforts. Just noticed how old the latest comments are so i appologize if I am out dated in my previous post. From personal research, I can say confidently that at least parts of the Apollo missions were dramatized in a studio (or otherwise botched and released as real). Recently discovered your vids, and my only complaint is some of your experiemnts are little less than scientrific :P But your main evidence seems solid. Cheers!

[statikregimen]

Don't use Celestia! Due to the vast distances between celestial objects, 1 pixel on your screen will represent at least hundreds or even thousands+ kilometers of distance. This is worsened by the aliasing (or worse: anti-aliasing) done by the rendering engine. To further complicate, Celestia will never let you get to "eye level" from the surface of a body. It will be, at best, several meters above. Thus, the small differences in position, to me, are acceptable. Or i could be wrong. Just sayin :)

[ccc771]

Not only are NASA tampering with there Photos but there also trying to pass the Hoax onto us here in Australia but saying they cant find the Telemetry for the Apollo program " they believe someone in Australia's got it'!!! keep your Apollo program and it's quackery where it belongs in America we don't want it. Your Dumb Telemetry you threw out yourself, knowing full well what rubbish it was.

[LunarTuner]

I hadn't noticed. I haven't gone anywhere. I just have a 9-to-5 and it gets me busy sometimes. I have immediately removed it.

I watched your video. Frankly, the fact that you found several "candidates" seems to suggest to me a distinct lack of certainty on your part and you seem to inadvertently impugn Bill Kaysing who believes NASA did not attempt to include fake stars.

You're talented WJ, but not precise and not careful.

But rather than pursue this here, I'm put my comments on that video.