talking about organized defense in anarchist society
I recored this about a bazillion years ago and just now uploaded it... interesting note: I originally typed in 'bajillion years ago' and google chrome caught "bajillion" as a misspelled word. It offered bazillion as the correct spelling... ????
"Armed security needs to be collectivized in order to prevent specific actors from coercing others for ther own benefit"
Your blinded by propaganda, when you get a "collectivized" defense the coercion is applied to everyone and the self benefit comes at the cost of the deaths of hundreds of thousands, like Haliburton and Bush's oil buddies profiteering from Iraq.
When you legitimize the stealing of money through taxes you just up the scale of potential corruption.
@BlueMountains28 Competing security firms is exactly what you want. The way you compete for profits--that are obtained through voluntary means--is by providing a great service. Great services do not include violence or killing consumers or others. If a company takes a violent approach to competition the consumer leaves the equation because he will not support a violent business. On top of this violence is a waste of resources in the end and is not a profitable path for any organization. ;)
"Armed security needs to be collectivized in order to prevent specific actors from coercing others for ther own benefit, such as protection rackets" - LOL. You fuckin moron.... collectivized security IS a protection racket
i think that the people arguing on this page are not anarchists, sarcasm and slander are forms of coercion. insted lets go to a Consensus like real anarchists and destroy power and onc and for all form a Sustainable stateless society
make a video. call me out. do it. challenge me in some way other than assertions and ad-homs.
What sort of world do you live in that does not recognize that failure is a reality? And I do not consider Somalia a anarchy. It is very close, but in a real analysis it is not a 100% anarchy especially considering such heavy foreign state involvement in the region.
@BlueMountains28
"Armed security needs to be collectivized in order to prevent specific actors from coercing others for ther own benefit"
Your blinded by propaganda, when you get a "collectivized" defense the coercion is applied to everyone and the self benefit comes at the cost of the deaths of hundreds of thousands, like Haliburton and Bush's oil buddies profiteering from Iraq.
When you legitimize the stealing of money through taxes you just up the scale of potential corruption.
Hashishin13 11 months ago
@HailRasec They don't believe in libertarianism at all for one. Secondly they are probably backed by some government or another to be like that.
Hashishin13 11 months ago
@BlueMountains28 Competing security firms is exactly what you want. The way you compete for profits--that are obtained through voluntary means--is by providing a great service. Great services do not include violence or killing consumers or others. If a company takes a violent approach to competition the consumer leaves the equation because he will not support a violent business. On top of this violence is a waste of resources in the end and is not a profitable path for any organization. ;)
neue01 1 year ago
I'm a mutualist but a do agree with the Militia as defense for an anarchistic society. Great video bro
AnarchyIsLiberty 1 year ago
some anarchists don't like consensus lol.
seigneurvoland666 2 years ago
i thought you were going to say zapatistas
seigneurvoland666 2 years ago
Colombian paramilitary is amongst the most despotic in the world. Consider this point, sir.
HailRasec 2 years ago
"Armed security needs to be collectivized in order to prevent specific actors from coercing others for ther own benefit, such as protection rackets" - LOL. You fuckin moron.... collectivized security IS a protection racket
thorsmitersaw 2 years ago
i think that the people arguing on this page are not anarchists, sarcasm and slander are forms of coercion. insted lets go to a Consensus like real anarchists and destroy power and onc and for all form a Sustainable stateless society
screamo5150 2 years ago
make a video. call me out. do it. challenge me in some way other than assertions and ad-homs.
What sort of world do you live in that does not recognize that failure is a reality? And I do not consider Somalia a anarchy. It is very close, but in a real analysis it is not a 100% anarchy especially considering such heavy foreign state involvement in the region.
thorsmitersaw 2 years ago