NBA 2K10 vs. NBA Live 10 Face Comparison
Uploader Comments (andrewvrodriguez)
All Comments (3,019)
-
Live has better graphics but 2k better gameplay
-
Steve nash 2K10 looks like Tony Montana from Scarface.
-
this is not neccesary.... it is YOUTUBE not YOUSLIDE..
if you want to compare these 2 games.. just look for the other game with same developer..
it's about 2k and EA rights? if you want to compare the graphic just look over
EA : the godfather 2
2k : Mafia 2
and yo'll know the answer
-
I dont think it was fair. You took bad pictures of 2K while they did stupid faces and the brightness looked bad. You took really good pictures of Live. I have both games and i know 2K doesnt look that bad and Live looks that good.
-
LIKE KILLED
-
LIVE wins
-
blake griffon 2k......emberasment
-
Tamuch2312sas21 , ea wasn't taking a year off .ea elite sucked. U just best hope it comes out. I do to but for the cover
-
NBA live is so fucking stupid...NBA 2k10 RULES !!!
-
@PotterFan29 what? EA is more realistic... EA NHL definitely is more realistic than 2k, same with NCAA football/NFL... 2k doesn't have a football game anymore, and I doubt the NHL game may not be out much longer either, taking the year off... NBA I guess went to 2K, having EA take the year off in that game. I liked Ea's NBA game, though. Got 2k11 because of MJ. But the only game 2k is great at is MLB
Okay, I get it, TMac's face is the same for. My bad. Nothing to get your panties in a bunch over.
andrewvrodriguez 6 months ago