UFO - or Cracked canopy? Courtesy BBC

I have heard so many times that this is a chip, crack, mark, bird shit etc etc in the glass. This shows why it is not! I have embossed the image, sharpened slightly and added some contrast. This should also dispel the drop tank, released ordnance theory even though that was one of the more ridiculous ones I've read it has to be pointed out. As for the B-2 I think this quite clearly shows that is a non starter.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• ufo
• israel
• jets
• f-16
• f-16i
• ovni
• tr-3b
• flying
• saucer
• anti
• gravity

[jacksladdercreative]

Are you for REALLL? OMG It took me so long to even SEE what you were all talking about. It looks like a glint of reflected sunlight from, hrmmm maybe the SUN!!?!

Sorry this one is just like a limp #%@&!

[mustanglead]

@jacksladdercreative lol! "Should've gone to Specsavers". Your friends must think you are so clever.

[andyscotlandtube]

Why dont you emboss an image without the f16 on it? Lets get a clear image of the UFO!

[mustanglead]

I have done lots of them.. It looks real nice! I'd love to have the whole bit of original film to clarify it.

[Nilguiri]

That is so obvioulsy a scratch on the canopy!

The only way I would believe this was a UFO was if the Israelis had denied it. Then you would know for sure that it was true as they are incapable of telling the truth about ANYTHING.

If the Zionist gobshite scum IDF said that the sky was blue, I would have to have a look outside to make sure - and get my eyes checked if I saw it was blue.

[Asmodi87]

Someone who believes in UFOs also believes in Santa Clause...

How... How... How...

[drunkalfuzzyness]

it would have been better if you slowed down the footage. im not even sure what i was looking at.

[truxton2]

Sorry, but it's something on the shield/canopy. You can see it clearly that, when the camera moves down, the bright spots moves up exacly like the "UFO". When at 0:13, the camera stops moving down and moves up for a sec, both the bright spot and the "UFO" moves accordling.

[mustanglead]

Do not mis-quote me.. A crack or a chip would be a serious issue I never said anything about scratches as these occur on canopy surfaces all the time and are only superficial. "consistency movements" what are you on about? If they move with the camera it must be on the camera lens not on the canopy.. You cannot have it both ways! You really are being stupid now!

[Coraxuss]

That's what I told Mustanglead even when he told me that any scratch or a chip in a canopy would ground a plane or make it fly at a lower altitude, but he has yet to explain the consistency movements.

[cofdeath]

Roflmao, those are just scratches in the canopy. They only move when the camera is moving, and thier movement is directly portional to the movement of the camera. Meaning these are fixed objects.