Moon Mission Hidden Photos Exposed 2012

May I present to you images 0:07 and 0:10 ? - What is so spectacular about these photos? Well, very interesting photo images for sure. First of all, 0:10 man on the moon has his full gear on. Bulky and he looks like the Goodyear Man - round and ready to head to Ole' Man Winter. It is really cold on the moon and they say that the "surface temperature" is about 200 Degrees Farenheith early lunar morning and about 350 - 400 degrees Farenheith during a lunar day. At least from data that has been gathered so far. But Photo at 0:07 Says otherwise. It says you do not need a helmet to breathe with or in need of a full suit in order to not freeze to death either - or burn from the sun's radiational rays.

What you see on 0:07 is the Interior suit. The orange suit or inner liner suit. You do not see the backpack with the oxygen tanks and you do not see the helmet like you see on 0:10 . What you do see is someone with a set of hair. Not necessarily someone that went to the moon - I'm not saying they didn't either - but someone that has access and took precautionary measures to "veil" any coincidences that would pinpoint to a lunar "side job' for reasons other than "presenting the entire truth".

I do believe we went to the moon. But I also believe that they understood the need to replicate certain areal flyby lunar missions in order to "enhance" the "visible" by making it "invisible". What do I mean by that - "visible" and "invisible"? What is visible is what is seen with the natural "eye lens" - unretouched. What is "invisible" is what is NOT seen with the natural "eye lens", but rather a "Replication" of what they know is there, but "without the undisclosed truth".

A Replication is something that is "reconstructed". A Duplication is something that is made readily available without having to reconstruct. You just simply provide the duplicate. But in this case the "replicate" becomes "their" duplicate. Even on live national television. So I say say to my audience, I do not doubt out trip to the moon. I believe we were there without any reasonable doubt. But I do question the "validty" of many of the images presented here. There are many more where they came from.

The rest of the images are a compilation of moon photos, but some may not be of the real moon. Best way to keep your eyes from the truth is to "divert" the "real" truth by creating "make-believe" scenarios. Create another moon to prove there are no bases on the moon, "shards" and "castles" and other thing that shouldn't be there for the public to see. Or "making" shards and castles for the public to see, creating a distraction form something else. You have to see both sides from opposite views. There is always "TWO SIDES" for every side of "the coin".
And as always, I'm only presenting "that" which has been found and "now" it has "always been left up to you to decide" what the "real" truth is. It doesn't happen overnight, but it begins with an open mind.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• moon
• mission
• imagery
• photos
• nibiru
• mars
• marduk
• planet

[YDDES]

@kingbrunodagaul Maybe in a war situation one wouldn't hesitate to launch rockets over populated areas, but as it took months to assemble, test and fuel the Saturn V's, they still had been useless as weapons. Furthermore, one nuclear bomb at Cape Canaveral and the Saturn launching possibilities had been history.

And, as I said: Totally meaningless from a military point of view to launch a few giant satellites with lots of bombs to Earth orbit. Hard to aim and easy to knock out.

[YDDES]

@kingbrunodagaul Fine. Tell me where to find these "papers" about Saturn V being a weapons system.

Really, think about it: There were no Saturn V launching pads or giant Vehicle Assembly Buildings anywhere than on KSC. Not even at Vandenberg in California, where the military launch their polar orbiting satellites. You can't hide those things and the military didn't keep it a secret that they built launching facilities for the Shuttle at Vandenberg.

[YDDES]

@jerichomutant Of course the astronauts didn't stop every 30 second to take a picture. They took several in rapid sucession on one place and moved on to do other things. As the cameras were fastened on their chests, it did't take much time or effort to just snap some photos. They had trained extensively to aim the cameras just by positioning their bodies. For the landscape photos that was totally sufficient. Only for the close ups, they had to be more careful in aiming.

[YDDES]

@jerichomutant Luckily You are free to laugh, but it's better to check facts. Very many of the Apollo astronauts photos were taken on the way or in lunar orbit. You can check out all Apollo 11's photos on "Apollo 11 Image Library", were You even can see all the "failed" photos (there are libraries even from other journeys to find). As You can see, MANY pictures are less than perfect.

The cameras were modified by Hasselblad to allow the astronauts to handle them with gloves on. 

[kingbrunodagaul]

@YDDES these tests were all a secret when it was going on, and who would care about safety reasons of this country or land when the whole planet would about to be nuked all over from both sides, as I keep saying, the peaceful intentions of just exploring the moon was a perfect cover for the military to test stuff out, there is a 30 year law, where government secrets have to be revealed after 30 years, and I read about the hidden nuclear aspects in a disclosure about it,

[YDDES]

@kingbrunodagaul As You see, the Staurn V wasn't useful as a weapon system. It was specifically designed and built to bring American astronauts to Moon, before the Soviets got there.

I may also tell You that launching polar orbiting satellites from KSC is prohibited, because the rockets would have to fly over populated areas on their way up through the atmosphere and that can't be allowed for safety reasons.

[YDDES]

@kingbrunodagaul If You fly over the equator, how do you hit a target in Siberia? The only realistic method would be to launch armed satellites orbiting over the poles, but that is impossible from KSC, the only place Saturn V's could be launched. And, one big satellite with a lot of bombs, in polar orbit, could need many hours before it's orbit took it over the target. It would be better to use many smaller rockets in different polar orbits. Even harder to knock out.

[adrianbrowne1984]

bull shit

[jerichomutant]

@jerichomutant Go & duct tape a camera to your chest, put on thick winter mittens, a motorcycle helmet with the visor down, then go around your neighborhoood & take 6 thousand photos. Let's see how many of your photos come out beautifully framed like the Moon Masons. You know how many of the Apollonots were Masons? A LOT. Now, let's see...what possible advantage would a person who belongs to a SECRET society, known for keeping SECRETs, what kind of advantage would that give them? HOAX!

[jerichomutant]

@YDDES Hundreds? Hahahaha. NASA took thousands of photos of their DISNEY set. With a Hasselblad camera - which is why i KNOW they faked the mission. A few astroNOTs with an old fashioned camera could not take that many photos wearing welding gloves, a motorcycle helmet visor down and NO VIEW FINDER even if all they did was fly to the moon and take pictures. THERE ISNT ENOUGH TIME, nor is is logistically possible!!!!!!!!!