the calculator said i would receive $1000 of someone else's hard-earned money. i would rather not accept government charity, and i hate government theft. what i want is MY money, a cut on MY earnings. by the time that stolen $1000 gets to me it will have lost its value. obama vs. mccain: a choice between two dicks to fuck you in the asshole. i won't be fucked voluntarily. DO NOT VOTE FOR EITHER DICK! unless you like that sort of thing.
And of course, I have to address this one "Ever heard of scientific research funding, or environmental groups, or political action organizations, or biomedical research, or countless other causes?" That sir, qualifies as pouring money into the system to "spark economic growth" with the government expectation that the growth will eventually "trickle down" to the poor. We've been there, doe that. It didn't work. Open a high school history book.
Hey genius, of course they give to charities when it looks good for the shareholders on the quarterly statement. But the giving doesn't increase when cash gets showered on them by the government in times of recession. (Remember, that's what we are talking about?) Perhaps sir, I actually have a college degree in this stuff.
You are really given to foul name calling, aren't you? I think you just peruse YouTube looking for people offend with your foul language. Again, you're not very bright.
I am not very bright? Why? Because I say that high income people give money to charities or foundations, and you equate that with passing money on to the poor? Perhaps, you are the one who is not very bright.
Charities and foundations do not only give to the poor, moron. Very many have nothing to do with the poor. Ever heard of scientific research funding, or environmental groups, or political action organizations, or biomedical research, or countless other causes? What a dipshit!
elijah5791 writes: "Um, no shit, dumbass! Here IS what they do: they invest, which provides capital for companies to expand and create more jobs for middle, and low income, workers; they spend, which creates a need for workers at every level like retail, labor, sales, etc.; and they give, specifically to charities or foundations, usually as a tax shelter, and usually shitloads of money, that help numerous causes around the world."
That would be passing it on to the poor. You're not very bright.
Elijah5791: Maybe you should read have the entire comment before you ran a muck with the name calling.
BTW, take a good old fashioned history class. The "trickle down theory" was one of the failed solutions for the great depression. That's how we already know it doesn't work. The wealthy DON'T invest and expand during times of recession and depression, even if you throw gov't money at them. You really think they give to charities? Wow! You are naive. No wonder you resort to name calling.
"Give money to the wealthy, they do not pass it on to the poor."
Um, no shit, dumbass! Here IS what they do: they invest, which provides capital for companies to expand and create more jobs for middle, and low income, workers; they spend, which creates a need for workers at every level like retail, labor, sales, etc.; and they give, specifically to charities or foundations, usually as a tax shelter, and usually shitloads of money, that help numerous causes around the world.
If the Bush tax cuts expire, and the average $40,000/yr wage earner sees his/her taxes increase by just 2% ($800), how can Obama possibly justify a $500 wealth redistribution check as a tax "decrease"? Also, Obama wants to tax profits on home sales at 28%. McCain will not profits on home sales under $500,000. How is this an Obama "tax cut" again?
Obama supporters chant: "Obama! Obama! Obama!"
McCain supporters chant: "USA! USA! USA!"
Wake up America. Obama has pulled the wool over your eyes.-
The "trickle down" theory does not work with cash flow. Give money to the wealthy, they do not pass it on to the poor and middle class. But it DOES work with expenses. Increase expenses (Obama's tax increase) to the wealthy business owner and he will definitely pass them on to his customers and employees. He's not going to loose money. Think you're getting more money? Nope. You're going to hand it over to the wealthy business owner through price increases and decreased employment benefits.
We are going to hell unless we do something about this fucking stupid black facist bitch.
Stoyakovick47 2 years ago
the calculator said i would receive $1000 of someone else's hard-earned money. i would rather not accept government charity, and i hate government theft. what i want is MY money, a cut on MY earnings. by the time that stolen $1000 gets to me it will have lost its value. obama vs. mccain: a choice between two dicks to fuck you in the asshole. i won't be fucked voluntarily. DO NOT VOTE FOR EITHER DICK! unless you like that sort of thing.
behindtheparadigm 3 years ago
And of course, I have to address this one "Ever heard of scientific research funding, or environmental groups, or political action organizations, or biomedical research, or countless other causes?" That sir, qualifies as pouring money into the system to "spark economic growth" with the government expectation that the growth will eventually "trickle down" to the poor. We've been there, doe that. It didn't work. Open a high school history book.
jdowdell2002 3 years ago
Hey genius, of course they give to charities when it looks good for the shareholders on the quarterly statement. But the giving doesn't increase when cash gets showered on them by the government in times of recession. (Remember, that's what we are talking about?) Perhaps sir, I actually have a college degree in this stuff.
You are really given to foul name calling, aren't you? I think you just peruse YouTube looking for people offend with your foul language. Again, you're not very bright.
jdowdell2002 3 years ago
I am not very bright? Why? Because I say that high income people give money to charities or foundations, and you equate that with passing money on to the poor? Perhaps, you are the one who is not very bright.
Charities and foundations do not only give to the poor, moron. Very many have nothing to do with the poor. Ever heard of scientific research funding, or environmental groups, or political action organizations, or biomedical research, or countless other causes? What a dipshit!
elijah5791 3 years ago
elijah5791 writes: "Um, no shit, dumbass! Here IS what they do: they invest, which provides capital for companies to expand and create more jobs for middle, and low income, workers; they spend, which creates a need for workers at every level like retail, labor, sales, etc.; and they give, specifically to charities or foundations, usually as a tax shelter, and usually shitloads of money, that help numerous causes around the world."
That would be passing it on to the poor. You're not very bright.
jdowdell2002 3 years ago
Elijah5791: Maybe you should read have the entire comment before you ran a muck with the name calling.
BTW, take a good old fashioned history class. The "trickle down theory" was one of the failed solutions for the great depression. That's how we already know it doesn't work. The wealthy DON'T invest and expand during times of recession and depression, even if you throw gov't money at them. You really think they give to charities? Wow! You are naive. No wonder you resort to name calling.
jdowdell2002 3 years ago
"Give money to the wealthy, they do not pass it on to the poor."
Um, no shit, dumbass! Here IS what they do: they invest, which provides capital for companies to expand and create more jobs for middle, and low income, workers; they spend, which creates a need for workers at every level like retail, labor, sales, etc.; and they give, specifically to charities or foundations, usually as a tax shelter, and usually shitloads of money, that help numerous causes around the world.
Pwned, bitch!!!
elijah5791 3 years ago
If the Bush tax cuts expire, and the average $40,000/yr wage earner sees his/her taxes increase by just 2% ($800), how can Obama possibly justify a $500 wealth redistribution check as a tax "decrease"? Also, Obama wants to tax profits on home sales at 28%. McCain will not profits on home sales under $500,000. How is this an Obama "tax cut" again?
Obama supporters chant: "Obama! Obama! Obama!"
McCain supporters chant: "USA! USA! USA!"
Wake up America. Obama has pulled the wool over your eyes.-
JetJagger 3 years ago
The "trickle down" theory does not work with cash flow. Give money to the wealthy, they do not pass it on to the poor and middle class. But it DOES work with expenses. Increase expenses (Obama's tax increase) to the wealthy business owner and he will definitely pass them on to his customers and employees. He's not going to loose money. Think you're getting more money? Nope. You're going to hand it over to the wealthy business owner through price increases and decreased employment benefits.
jdowdell2002 3 years ago