Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

8 - core MacPro render speed

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
53,992
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 22, 2008

Running Cinebench 9.5 on 2 Quad Core 2.8 Xeon processors.

47 seconds using 1 core, 45 secs w/o running the screencapture.
13 seconds using all 8 cores. 10 secs w/o running the screen capture.


Note: A screen capturing program adds a few seconds to the final render time. The screen capture program is using all 8 cores.

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (jeznaver)

  • @notanoae

    Best purchase ever...in 2008. I get paid a lot for the work I do so cost isn't my worry. But the amount of tasks, projects, rendered frames I've gone through isn't comparable than using my old windows P4 1.8Ghz machine, nor I should wait for 2010+ intel's technology to come out. In fact, I'd custom built two i7 Bloomfield machines as a clustered render server. You don't want to see my energy bills when these clusters running 24/7... :D

Top Comments

  • Hey, why don't you render an actual graphic-intensive scene? This scene is nothing.

    I'll give you some scenes to render with V-ray... See how "fast" it is then.

    I'm not trying to be a dick, but this scene just isn't that good of an example.

  • Or it's called FAIL.  Just like shitty vista.

see all

All Comments (100)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @evolutionpr What, the max voltage limit for E8400 is 65 watts, are you dumb, 125 is for Core 2 quad Q6600

    Mine only consumes 30 and CAN prove it.

    Oh actually it consumes 18.75 at full load, but it's at stock clock ;)

  • @hyrael2

    uhm...30 watts?

    The C2D e8400 consumes 125+.

    An easy google search proves that

  • im sorry but mac sucks

  • Mein AMD Athlon X4 640 braucht auf Multi 13 Sekunden. Und das mit nur 4 Kernen auf 3GHz

  • 47 Sekunden für einen Bildaufbau?? Wahnsinn!

  • Xeon is just a shiny name. They actually suck. Kthx.

  • @Timvanhelsdingen thats not entirely true. depends on the program

  • Hey jeznaver! Can you tell me The resolution of The picture?! To have a real idea of The time!!

  • @Timvanhelsdingen unless your using cuda... then the gpu will help out

  • @Site4Animation yeah... the scenes are UGLY AS HELL. I actually can't believe that cinebench is actually real.

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more