1,552 views
Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window
Goodness Without God is Good Enough: William Lane Craig vs Paul Kurtz 6/7
A debate between renowned Christian apologist and philosopher William Lane Craig and prominent humanist philosopher Paul Kurtz at Franklin & Marshall College discussing whether God is necessary for...
Featured Videos
Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
14 ratings
Sign in to rate
1,358 views
© 2009 YouTube, LLC
IMO, Craig changed the focus of the original topic "Goodness without God is Good Enough" to a philosophical question of the objective basis for moral decisions. This was a clever tactic that threw Kurtz offguard, who essentially argued for a practical morality, relative only to the standards of evolved civilization.
Temporary meaning, purpose etc...
In other words... subjective morality & ethics, which is fine, if God doesn't exist, but it's still ultimately meaningless
I see you awake but you are not really there.
You walk around in a hollow shell.
Living a life of mental stagnation.
Seeking the comfort of reassuring lies.
Your shallow mind, in a church of fools.
Living a life of willing ignorance.
Never thinking, forever dim.
Nothing's more pathetic than a brainless drone.
Vicious cycles of lies to cover lies.
Just another robot in factory of falsehoods.
A hollow puppet controlled by strings.