Top Comments
All Comments (998)
-
Best interpretation of the piece!
-
It's very well interpreted... but the pace is too fast...
-
I came here after the first two and was thinking, "let's see him try to play this one too fast." And I have to say I ate my words
-
@xDXd624 He wanted to get done with the romantic composers and start with some real Johann Sebastian Bach music.
-
who knows how Beethoven wanted that piece to be played ? All interpretations are only interpretations !Kissin Barenboim Horowitz Kempff Perahia ....are all very good! Emil Gilels version is exactly how I imagine this should be :) but i have to admit Gould reinvented it with brio !!
-
I see why he didn't repeat the the 3rd mvnt, I tried playing at his tempo and I was tired as hell when I finished lol!! Frigin genius!!
-
2:54 Gould's vocal interpretation XD. Hes a recording engineers nightmare!
Gotta love him all the same, though <3
-
Not really.
Wilhelm Kempff - 137 BPM
Murray Perahia - 183 BPM
Glenn Gould - 209 BPM
Kempff is way too slow, Perahia the speed Beethoven intended, Gould the best :3
-
OBJECTION, he didn't 'want' to repeat. This piece easily gets boring if you play it slow and with the repetition, like Kempff.
I actually quite enjoy Gould's wild tempo and without that stupid repeat.
-
he forgot to repeat...



@BigBiff88 Gould doesn't do mistakes.
TonusAMaximus 3 months ago 26
wow, rofl. i want to see a video of his hands while playing this
whisperr33 1 month ago 10