Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

PAC-3 Missile Test

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
38,375
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 25, 2008

Footage of the PAC-3 missile taking out target missile at high altitude. Discover more videos and info about the upcoming documentary 33 Minutes on missile defense in America by visiting http://www.33minutes.com or http://www.heritage.org/33-minutes/index.htm

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (31)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @bum291 Well, my figures about the S-300/S-400's radar's range were not that different of yours. I said 300 km, you said 320 km. It's not such a big difference. Anyway, the S-300/S-400 are formidable anti-aircraft systems, in specially the S-400 which is more powerful than it western counterparts in many aspects.

  • @StiviGun1 They are mobile radars that can be linked to the S-300/400 system. I never claimed that they would be more powerfull than THAAD radar, I simply wanted to add a little more info about the S-300 family and the radar detection ranges.

  • @bum291 OK, first of all, what is PROTIVNIK-GE and GAMMA-DE? As for the radars that can detected targets at ranges of 400 km, they still don't compare with the THAAD's radar. THAAD is the most powerful land based mobile ABM system.

  • @StiviGun1 There are a few variants of radars with the "king" being 9S15MV3; a detection range of 320 km. The ones in Russia (and especially the ones around Moscow, Saratov and other strategic locations) will of most probably be linked to systems like PROTIVNIK-GE or GAMMA-DE with a range of 400 km and also co-operate with EWR. But other nations might not have those complementary radar systems. Note that 48N6E2 and 9M83ME missiles have a range of 200 km.

  • @gamekiiid developing it. THAAD is a really powerful system, more powerful than the S-400. But PAC-2 can also be improved to be better than the S-400.

  • @gamekiiid From what I know, the S-400 uses the same radars as the S-300, which have a range of 300 km max. The radar that coordinates the SM-3 missile over 450 km detection range. So no, the S-400's radar doesn't have more detection range, but future radars with 500-600 km range have been theorized 4 the S-400. Of course, this is still less than the THAAD's radar, that has a 1000 km detection range. THAAD is a really powerful system & I don't know why aren't they making a priority from

  • @StiviGun1 yes. but what you think? maybe s-400 radar is better? more range than sm-3?

  • @jit8910 Yeah, something is wrong with the link. Better post on my profile.

  • @gamekiiid Yeah, but in my opinion, the PAC-2 should be improved as well to have longer range, faster emplacement time and even vertical launching. The S-400 was developed only as a competition to the Patriot, the Russians don't have a real necessity 4 it, the Cold War is over. So the PAC-2 must be modified as well. You can increase its range by increasing the size of the engine & decrease the size of its fins & add TVC 4 improved maneuverability. The fins can also be made as folding fins.

  • @StiviGun1 you are right!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more