But Larry Silverstein Said "Pull It"!

Some people think Larry Silverstein admitted that he had Building 7 demolished. But the person he was talking to, Daniel Nigro, confirms that this is a misunderstanding.

An audio enhanced version of this video is available here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4m98OytsbE&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fforums%2Eran...

Many thanks, qarnos.

PS (16 February 2008): This video makes the claim that Daniel Nigro was the fire commander who talked to Silverstein. Daniel Nigro has confirmed today that he was not the person who spoke to Silverstein.

However, his statements make it clear that the FDNY was not involved in any demolition of 7, as do Silverstein's. As the chief of operations, any major FDNY action would have been approved by him. See this recent statement to show that demolition of 7 simply did not happen:

http://911guide.googlepages.com/danielnigro

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 911
• wtc7
• pull
• Silverstein

[darkSolutionX]

Actually, Nigro admitted that he never talked to Silverstein about pulling it which Silverstein denies...

[boloboffin]

@darkSolutionX Actually, I've included that correction in the annotations and the side materials. Since you're so willing to accept Nigro's statement as true, why don't you believe him when he says no decision was made by the fire department to demolish the buildings?

[darkSolutionX]

@boloboffin

I don't trust a lot of things that happened that day and I have read the NIST report. Surely you don'e believe that a steel building with concrete (NIST forgot to include concrete in their analysis) could collapse from fire and into its footprint? Concrete and steel work together to absorb heat.

If you see a building, realize that it is literally a giant steel skeleton reinforced with concrete. Fire hit other buildings worse and no collapse. Yet, everything turn to scrap and dust.

[boloboffin]

@darkSolutionX None of those buildings were reinforced with concrete. They simply were not. That's why NIST "forgot" to include concrete - there was no concrete there. You've brought up a complete falsehood to distract from my question to you. You're willing to believe Nigro just as far as it allows you to disbelieve Silverstein, but not one single step further. That's not seeking for truth. That's stubbornness in service of believing fantasy.

[buddyfreakinhoIIy]

@dubified89 Pull "it" as in pull the firefighting crew. He even clarified that he was talking about the firefighters. THe firefighters used the word "pull" that day too in reference to pulling back from the buidlings on fire. Why is it so hard for truthers to get this through their skulls? Is there anything else that indicates Silverstein was part of a demolition plot? Anything at all?

[eaglejoe8]

The idiocy of truthers is amazing. They actually want people to believe that Silverstein first committed a multi-billion dollar act of insurance fraud, then admitted to doing so on national TV, and then somehow, 2 years later in 2004, not one of the WTC complex's 24 insurance holders ever raised the issue of possible fraud before paying out a total of about $4.5 Billion in insurance claims. Logic has never seemed to permeate the so called "truth movement".

[EdgemanLL2]

@Joskel362 Did Larry say the firefighters were INSIDE the building at the time of the discussion?

[Joskel362]

"Establishment" based video..The building was evacuated hours before they collapsed it, including "firefighters". Get the truth! Silverstein is a notorious liar!

[EdgemanLL2]

@zenoist2 Sure, but 1) its not a demo term, and 2) more importantly to the actual point, people say Larry is lying about everything.

Well, if he lies about everything, why pretend his story about talking to FDNY is true?

Ooops!

[zenoist2]

Dont yout hink a politicianmighht possibly be wise about TV

?

[zenoist2]

@EdgemanLL2 he said it on live TV for crying out loud!

[EdgemanLL2]

@darkSolutionX Meaning you have no valid claim.

Understood.

[darkSolutionX]

@EdgemanLL2

Nah, I am just calling for a new Independent Investigation. Everyone needs to be investigated separately, not together like Cheney and Bush. Not saying I know everything and many of my hunches could be wrong, but it took years for Cheney to disclose his whereabouts on 911.

What most people don't know is that the govt had information that they were going to hit us.. That is just scary to me that they didn't react to this info.

[EdgemanLL2]

@darkSolutionX "If you can't show your work in real life then you have no valid claim."

Exactly. So either you can show me govt agents participating in the attacks, or you have no valid claim.

PERIOD.

Seriously. Think at ALL!

[darkSolutionX]

@EdgemanLL2

If you can't show your work in real life then you have no valid claim. A CGI simulation can be deceptive. A prototype is the first working model, which the AE for 911 has asked for. Don't have to be insulting me either. NIST report does not hold up to sound science. Do you realize that New York has some of the strictest building codes?

To make a building fall at free fall you have to remove the base, if you can't see that then you need to

seriously rethink what you are saying.