Upload

This video is unavailable.

Kagan Declines To Say Gov't Has No Power to Tell Americans What To Eat

RepublicanSCOTUS RepublicanSCOTUS·77 videos
249

Subscription preferences

Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Working...
462,536
Like     Dislike 96

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like RepublicanSCOTUS's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike RepublicanSCOTUS's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add RepublicanSCOTUS's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Jun 29, 2010

Sen. Coburn discusses the health care bill and the extent of the government's power to impose mandates on Americans under the authority of the Constitution's commerce clause. Coburn is holding a copy of the Federalist papers.


http://judiciary.senate.gov/about/mem...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Video Responses


All Comments (1,278)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • slamhead

    Wow! She basically thinks that there is nothing the federal government cannot do. This administration is so scary.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate slamhead's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate slamhead's comment.
  • kiiifute1

    Patrick Henry~

    The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people. It is an instrument for the people to restrain the government, least it come to dominate our lives and interests."

    Thomas Jefferson

    "The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." Under no circumstances does this beast belong on the High Court & certainly not as nominated by The Usurper

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate kiiifute1's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate kiiifute1's comment.
  • Entityofme1

    "courts would be wrong to strike down the lists that they think uh uh, duh , duh huh, that are senseless because they think they are senseless" ..LOL... what a small mind she has. Hey Kagan I agree with you 100%. Let's completely neglect the instincts of common sense in our courts and continue to legislate on the premise of auto pilot where the destination is clearly nowhere because thats exactly where your "rationale" is.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Entityofme1's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Entityofme1's comment.
  • OtherOne81

    Chillax brah The Chosen One appointed her

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate OtherOne81's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate OtherOne81's comment.
    in reply to AbrahamWasIAm (Show the comment)
  • MultiMoonkin

    I agree completely.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate MultiMoonkin's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate MultiMoonkin's comment.
    in reply to nycnikato (Show the comment)
  • Chris Downar

    She's NEVER even been a judge and she's worked for GOLDMAN SACHS. Checkout her clip saying the government should be allowed to to ban books. She IS the sign of the times.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Chris Downar's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Chris Downar's comment.
  • stevethrasher

     Perfectly Said!

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate stevethrasher's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate stevethrasher's comment.
    in reply to TruenotesMusic (Show the comment)
  • 8MCDonalds8

    I heard her legal tenure, as a professional in the field, was no more than 6 months???

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 8MCDonalds8's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 8MCDonalds8's comment.
    in reply to M KLlew (Show the comment)
  • 8MCDonalds8

    I have more experience in the military than Ms. K has in the legal field. Why have I not been nominated for Director of Homeland Security??? My active duty service time was 2.5 years. I also would not "try" to uphold the law nor "try" to be unbiased regarding my work. I would continue to act based on the oath I swore to prior to my nomination. I WOULD uphold the law and WOULD not have a bias-DISGUSTING!!!

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 8MCDonalds8's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 8MCDonalds8's comment.
  • WOWJBEOWULF

    The Commerce Clause was from abuse under the Articles of Confederation, by States that did heavy duties on imports--and passing through--trade, evidence by 11th Amendment. The Commerce Clause is broadly interpreted and reduce the Bill of Rights beyond trade into their own Supreme law, also seen free speech restriction by personal obscene values (Lady Chatterley's Lover); it empowers Congress to say anything passing between States is Federal law, but abuse is to regulate the People themselves.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate WOWJBEOWULF's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate WOWJBEOWULF's comment.
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later