Beyond Conspiracy - Kennedy assassination

A few clips from the documentary "The Kennedy Assassination - Beyond Conspiracy" ABC aired this program in 2003, the 40th anniversary of the shooting. It was hosted by Peter Jennings. In my opinion, it supports the most logical (as supported by evidence) view - that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in assassinating President John Kennedy on November 22, 1963.

If you care to discuss the assassination with me in a more direct manner (circumventing the cumbersomeness of the YouTube comment system), you are invited to my blog http://11-22-1963.blogspot.com/

• Category

  Education

[fiddlefolk]

Yeah, okay!

[The9Nazgul]

It would certainly fit cleaner into a "LN narrative" had LHO taken out EW -- we then wouldn't have this question. But one thing I've learned about science in the real world (not in a laboratory) is that things seldom are so "clean." There are ALWAYS anomalies. Always. Call it chaos theory. These historical events developed in real time. LHO almost took out his first target. But something happened that resulted in his hitting the window pane. Could've been anything. But that's how it happened.

[The9Nazgul]

I'm still hovering around... good to see you still are too...

[NOC1TIME]

Guess your idiots may feel the same about you

I'll meet you half way and agree it's a very simple crime.

If you will consider its not killing the person thats so difficult . its the getting away with it. The end game. What type of historical records are you talking about, the Gulf of Tonkin stuff or Nixon threatening Helms with the "whole Bay Of Pigs thing resurfacing in a continued FBI investigation.

My son also got a Master in History, Good for you. Hes now a Policeman in the south.

[TheMrktd1]

PS-NOTHING magic where I'm concerned. I'm not too sure about you. Mock-up in the TSBD?

[TheMrktd1]

Oh please, this is more than he said -she said. What galls me the most is the constant distortion of the historical record by conspiracy idiots. Yup, I said idiots. I guess , instead of going with my first hunch (Masters in History) I went in a different direction.But I still have the utmost respect for the historical record, which HAS been distorted. This is a very simple crime. Very simple. It's not ME who has made it more complicated than it needs to be.

[TheMrktd1]

To try and look innocent.

[NOC1TIME]

>Attacks on the WR have stimulated attacks on the attackers. Charges have prompted countercharges.

Reasoned argument has given way to personal invective and character assassinations. The second generation of assassination studies has ended in public confusion and frustration.

A first step of a radically different sort is now required.

Joahiah Thompson August 67

This isn't about you or I K man. Those were the actual hands on people and those that have been there since day one.Unless yer a troll

[NOC1TIME]

I guess you are attempting to mock my posts about addressing assholes on this threat.

I think there is a decent well informed core group here.

I am saying in stead of attacking the character of people whom is not even actually known. If you are informed and confident in your position.

Then show it by attempting to give the discussion the respect it deserves.

Now some people come here for the dumb shit. I do give it right back. as you know. Got Some Josiah Thompson in this area >

[NOC1TIME]

I guess you can't believe theres an argument or debate because you have your mind made up and thats great. So is my own and many others.

I wont bother arguing who's the doorman at the twilight zone. LN or CT. Face it, there's a lot of "magic' stuff coming down wind from the LN heard. We are equally amazed at time and effort to defend the defenseless. It dosen't need to be an argument Mrk. You feel he did it other do not. Trust this conversation was started long before we joined it.