Love Our China 爱我中华 宋祖英

Love Our China 爱我中华 宋祖英

Category:

Music

Tags:

• LoveOurChina
• songzuying
• song
• zu
• ying

[cyj42121]

I love you,CHINA!

[cyj42121]

I love you deeply,My CHINA!

[hiya9012]

@Coltsfan do not insult other people's languages. It backfires on you.就像这样。

[zhiwei128]

I love you!!!! China..forever!!!

[Coltsfan]

@Ilikelink lol well like Chinese, I think English is a beautiful language and should stay the way it is.

[Ilikelink]

@Coltsfan Actually I think simplifying English spelling would be an excellent idea, even though if someone tried it many native English speakers would certainly complain as well, because they would argue that so much ancient culture lies in their illogical spelling!

[Coltsfan]

@Ilikelink Yes, I am Taiwanese, but I am fluent in Japanese and I can tell you that their character simplification is something I can support. I mentioned that some characters need to be cut down; their process was infinitely more reasonable than what the Communists did. Of the 3K-4K characters that you need to be fluent, I'd say they cut less than 200, maybe less than 100. In response, I'd say that English is too complex. Instead of "laugh," lets make it "laf," and turn "because" to "bcoz."

[Ilikelink]

@Coltsfan Furthermore, remember that simplifyng the characters is not necessarily a "communist" thing. Even before Mao Zedong took power, many Chinese intellectuals wanted to simplify the writing system, and not all of them were Communists. Even the Japanese have simplified the Chinese characters which they use by the way, although their simplification system is different. The truth is that the old characters are impractically complicated and difficult to learn. Are you Taiwanese by any chance?

[Ilikelink]

@Coltsfan hi. I hope you don't mind if I reply in English. I am learning Chinese and I currently live in Beijing, but I still find it difficult to express myself in Chinese on such a difficult topic. I don't see why simplifying the characters means losing China's traditional culture. As long as the basic language and writing system remains the same, does it matter if the radicals which make up the characters are simplified a bit?

[Coltsfan]

@Ilikelink 你神經病嗎？台灣，香港，以及日本的識字率至今還高於中國大陸的­。你怎麼能繼續跟我們講簡體字是必要的呢？的確，有些字是應該減­的，例如“烏龜”的”龜“字與“鬱悶”的“鬱”。但是“否認”的­“認”真的要減成“认”嗎？言字旁真的也必須簡體化嗎？有那麼難­寫嗎？毛澤東命令簡體化漢字時只有一個目的：文化革命。他就是想­摧毀中國的傳統文化，以此方式讓他所謂的“革命”蔓延到我們人生­各界各地。簡體字就是因此而出現，所以採取此政策是因為毛澤東及­中國共產黨的鞏固政權計劃。正體字是我們中國最獨特的特點之一，­何不竭盡全力保存？如果共產黨不想失去“天命”，它不但得較好解­決老百姓的艱難生活問題而且也得恢復中華文化到它以前的水準。歷­史上有許多例子，譬如康熙皇帝。他的統治是中國的多數黃金時代之­一因為他當時進行了對於經濟界與文化界有支援的法則及策略。

總之，正體字是我們華人的一個珍貴的寶物，也是中華文化的底子的­一個固有部分。

中華文化，發揚光大。

[Ilikelink]

@961816ronald Simplifying Chinese was a necessity for the sake of universal literacy. Even with simplified Chinese, it takes Chinese people years and years to learn all the characters they need. With traditional Chinese it is even worse. Try learning to write 體 instead of 体! Plus, when you look at a web page in traditional characters you need to enlarge the writing a lot to even be able to read it. 简体字万岁！

[ac3761G]

Love Our China 爱我中华 宋祖英

ejinns 17 videos  Subscribe