Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

TA288-96H Buick 455

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
12,864
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 9, 2006

Audio only (with a picture of the car) of a TA 288-96H cam in an 8.5:1 compression Buick 455 motor.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (AGuyNamedSteve)

  • u should raise the compression ratio to original 10.25:1

  • The original compression ration in 1972 was 8.5:1. The motor is a 1976 block with 1972 heads on it. This was an original block with heads/cam/intake/carb/headers added to it. It also spun a rod bearing on my second pass.

  • i was talkin about original compression ratio in 1970 when it was at full power

  • Ok, gotcha.

    Since this wasn't a 70, it was at full compression for its year. After the rebuild, it's around 9.6:1. To get it higher would have required more machine work to the deck surface, taken from the heads, or a complete change of piston. To get another .5 of a point wouldn't have been worth the extra cost to do so and wouldn't provide much return on the investment. If I were going to go with a lot more cam, it would have been a good idea, but not for the one I eventually ended up using.

see all

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Very nice!

  • thats good, i think i was wrong, for a 455 it was 10 to 1, for a 350 it was 10.25 to 1, anyhoo 1.6 to 1 good, engine sounds great

  • Did you honestly get that kind of a track time with such a cam and rear end thats crazy.

    I just bought a Lunati streetmaster for my olds 350 but im thinking of buying a 70 455 it's inexcellent running condition i'll of course change the oil pump, and have the heads rebuilt. The cam has a lobe seperation of 110

    Duration @ .050 (Int/Exh): 217/221

    Gross Valve Lift (Int/Exh): .485/.485

    LSA/ICL: 110/104

    RPM Range: idle-5500

    What kind of carb did you have cfm?

  • i have a crower cam in my 1970 455.its only 464-488 lift with 214-218 @ 050.but it ran a 13.10 12.95 with 350 turbo no stall and factory 2.28 open rear end and 245-60 14 street tires.had to baby it bad for 250 feet.but mph in quarter was 115.pull like a freight train.this cam would be awesome for 8.5 comp.street drive quiet sleeper.

  • buick sounds good...

  • Thanks for the information.

    Too bad about spinning a bearing, but it's typical with the bad oiling system on these motors, as I'm sure you know.

    Actually, narrower lobe centers are better for lower compression motors because they increase dynamic compression and cylinder pressure. Of course, you end up with a narrower power band in exchange, so it's a trade off. I'm still debating whether to go with something a little more radical, but your ETs say a lot about the potential of that cam.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more