Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

MotorWeek Road Test: 2009 Chevrolet Traverse

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
9,042
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 17, 2008

MotorWeek Road Test: 2009 Chevrolet Traverse

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Love that interior! Stylish, features galore, and very spacious for cargo.

    ......Not crazy about the exterior, though. (Especially that rear end!) gross...

  • @kenosisthunder I'm sure curb weight has some to do with that.

see all

All Comments (14)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @kenosisthunder the 2009(?) and later engines are direct fuel injected

  • I've been inside one and the dash isn't as high quality as they say they are. You'd be better off in a Booick Enclave.

  • motorweek got 0-60 time of 8.6 seconds for the outlook and 9.2 seconds for the enclave but got 7.8 seconds 0-60 time for the traverse, thats quite a difference

  • Very nice car. I love Chevrolet.

  • very nice! this is probably the best version of the gm suvs.

  • Not a bad vehicle. I just hate the ugly guage cluster....it looks like a pair of sad eyes.

  • Interior is shoddy quality wise and the rear end is ugly and boring. Lights are way too small. And why is everty single Traverse I see in Silver? It looks horrible in Silver!

  • No wonder GM is losing money, 4 car brands from the same platform ... it's good that the blind spot warning is standard, this is a monster on the road.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more