Starchild Cheeks and Neck Discussed
Uploader Comments (OfficialLloydPye)
All Comments (33)
-
@lemmyliquor 4Cont: Not an alien at all by definition but a modification through gene tampering, turning on recessives and such. Maybe they have synthetic they wove into our structure to create the lighter stronger framework and those are your unknown dna hits....! Much like mature native cultures refined earthenware to become thinner and stronger through experience and technology ''they'' may have simply re arranged us and introduced a new fiber to fill in the spaces left while De-bulking us.
-
3Cont: we were discovered by alien visitors, would they began to learn, tweak, and ready us for interstellar travel? First they have to learn our basics food, water environment. Then our physiology reproduction, nutrition, molecular make-up and cellular intricacies. With that as a platform they could begin to in this case lighten, strengthen and modify us to need little and cope the forces of travel. What if Starchild is an un-recovered or modern remain of the ancestor of those modified men..?
-
2Cont: documented...! If we could somehow predict and/or control the development of a human in 0-G we will by default begin a new type of hominid without what we currently define as natural evolution/mutation. Even with our meddling It is still nature so we cant call it a brand new species because it is 100% us, no cross-pollination or splicing more like a forced race of humans. Here comes the fun stuff. = D.. What if in the distant past say oh... 3-5 global communities ago Cont:
-
@OfficialLloydPye If the human responds to gravity like plants do then gravity is required to challenge our bodies to form the muscle/bone strength. Without the presence of gravitational pull/challenge the body would not only have significant embryonic difficulties its post development would be almost unpredictable. I'm guessing this was done almost immediately after developing easy reach into the outer atmosphere and orbit. Heck thats 60yrs by now...! Who knows what horrors/successes have been
people would show more interest if it weren't called star child.
SevenLivesManyFaces 3 months ago
@SevenLivesManyFaces : You're right. I've said many times that calling it Starchild was a mistake. We did it in the first week we had it, and we were not thinking ahead with it. If I had one major do-over with this, I would have tried for a more "neutral" name.
OfficialLloydPye 2 months ago
I've looking around and I found this
watch?v=omm8Ey8vwbg&feature=related
at 1:51. It looks somewhat simar to the Starchild, but it IS different..........Just thought I'd share I suppose.
miguelsz2 11 months ago
@miguelsz2 : Yes, that's interesting but not like the Starchild. Thanks!
OfficialLloydPye 11 months ago
Have you made any computer generated images of what it might have looked like when it was alive?
SuzLa1 1 year ago
@SuzLa1 : No, not computer generated, but you can see several drawings by various artists on the Starchild Project website, and Bill Munns created a sculpture for the History Channel that can be seen on Youtube.
OfficialLloydPye 1 year ago