@MaxwellEindhoven 99.999999% of the people did not work on the site. The percentage of people who worked on the site say otherwise. Go ahead and believe what you want.
@MaxwellEindhoven if you still believe that - no problem. There are plenty of reports from construction workers that state otherwise. Just do an easy google seach. Not going to get into it. Waste of time.
@JohnWroclaw Due to what? There wa no melted steel from the towers! There was molten aluminum from the planes yes! How about the millions of miles of electrical cords in the towers, they have a low melting temperature. How about all the computers and their printplates, how about the aluminum of the facade of the towers? There is no proof that your molten "steel" was from the towers structural supports.
@JohnWroclaw No, i'm talking about the plane crash causing most of the damage, and no, the steel never melted, it only was only weakened and lost total strength, causing it to collapse. BTW I ment a Boeing 767.
I feel sad when I warch this video. The People of Canada owned the Canadian National Railway at one time. We collectively owned hundreds of train stations; bridges; hotels (including the Chateau Laurier and the Queen Elizabeth, where "Give Peace A Chance" was recorded); roundhouses, offices towers and 32,000 hectares of land. Canada Lands Company decimated our railway history.
I dont understand why they just dont pour airplane fuel on the top floor and light it. Seems to be a much cheaper solution then using all those explosives
@MaxwellEindhoven 99.999999% of the people did not work on the site. The percentage of people who worked on the site say otherwise. Go ahead and believe what you want.
JohnWroclaw 6 months ago
@JohnWroclaw lol, so you would rather believe the 1 percent of people who state otherwise.
MaxwellEindhoven 6 months ago
@MaxwellEindhoven if you still believe that - no problem. There are plenty of reports from construction workers that state otherwise. Just do an easy google seach. Not going to get into it. Waste of time.
JohnWroclaw 6 months ago
@JohnWroclaw Due to what? There wa no melted steel from the towers! There was molten aluminum from the planes yes! How about the millions of miles of electrical cords in the towers, they have a low melting temperature. How about all the computers and their printplates, how about the aluminum of the facade of the towers? There is no proof that your molten "steel" was from the towers structural supports.
MaxwellEindhoven 6 months ago
@MaxwellEindhoven there was melted steel, and the reason given was due to that.
JohnWroclaw 6 months ago
@JohnWroclaw No, i'm talking about the plane crash causing most of the damage, and no, the steel never melted, it only was only weakened and lost total strength, causing it to collapse. BTW I ment a Boeing 767.
MaxwellEindhoven 6 months ago
@MaxwellEindhoven No a crash would burn off most of the fuel in a explosion and the fire would not have the chance to melt the steel
Much more efficient use of the fuel.
JohnWroclaw 6 months ago
I feel sad when I warch this video. The People of Canada owned the Canadian National Railway at one time. We collectively owned hundreds of train stations; bridges; hotels (including the Chateau Laurier and the Queen Elizabeth, where "Give Peace A Chance" was recorded); roundhouses, offices towers and 32,000 hectares of land. Canada Lands Company decimated our railway history.
savecfbrockcliffe 6 months ago in playlist Collapse
@JohnWroclaw I don't think so, unless you crash a Boeing 757 at top speed into the building. Then the fires might finish it off.
MaxwellEindhoven 6 months ago
I dont understand why they just dont pour airplane fuel on the top floor and light it. Seems to be a much cheaper solution then using all those explosives
JohnWroclaw 7 months ago