The Ranting Monkey: A Reply To Karen Dupe
Uploader Comments (Alhorian)
Top Comments
-
Obviously this isn't productive trying to reason with you so that's what I'll do. And I suppose if I'm wasting my time then you are wasting yours. I'll just agree to disagree...
Video Responses
All Comments (145)
-
Bloody Briliant you are, mate.
-
In Soviet Russia, Facebook page makes you!
-
ok zero putuation
-
@sausageandonion haha i think this bint is karen dupe
-
That was really funny and well done :)
-
I've been sitting here, watching your video's for, oh, the last few hours. I completely forgot about the Pot Noodle sitting next to me, damn thing had grown a forest by the time I picked it up. You're awesome, I love you, I want your manbabies. But, you owe me a Bombay Badboy. <3
-
i must be a robot then:(
-
y dont u make a facebook page
-
So apparently this article exists and its real.
Why would anyone say these things in a magazine that is for people who like this media? All I can say is that surely that actress didn't made her research before saying these things and she seams not being into it at all. So lets not flame on this Karen girl. But this answer is true. Movies and books are not better than video games and indeed nothing is perfect.
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You need to check your facts and figures dude. DVDs are NOT £20, and games these days are partly film. And they don't have real actors in them.Karen is a very well spoken and intelligent woman, you on the other hand, sound like someone who is having a rant for the sake of it. DO YOUR RESEARCH before kicking off. You really have no idea. Bless you.
sausageandonion 1 year ago
@sausageandonion Some research for you. Tranformers 2, Revenge of the Fallen, currently £22.99 in HMV. "Ripper" a PC game from the 90's had Christopher Walken in it, many consider him a "real" actor, now in 2010 almost all top line games have actors doing voice and motion capture work. Karen Dupe may be well spoken and intelligent, but she is also missinformed and in the above arguement almost completely wrong.
Alhorian 1 year ago 17