Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Witness D.C. 9/11

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
6,731
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 7, 2011

Full documentary, new in 2010.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (CTV911)

  • No plane parts?

see all

All Comments (52)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 17:32 policeman talks german:"hier können Sie nicht laufen! but they are not walking, the are filming

    look at the shoes! thats keying!CGI! blueboxshit!

    25:15 cannot believe the only person in front is a backpacker?!

    26:04 a bird is flying from the burning first floor?!

  • 43:30 WATCH FULLSIZE FRAME BY FRAME!!! AGAIN AND AGAIN!!!

    the big helicopter has too many transparent pixel around and is on an separate layer animated. when he crosses the other fake-helicopter you can see it clearly!

    44:00 and by whom is the ear left behind the speaker? it comes for some frames and goes! there is no place for a person...and whats with the other half head more left?

  • @klrdotorg

    *purposes*

    Anyway ... playing poker while I'm writing this. I understand your skepticism, and I appreciate talking to a skeptic who isn't rude. I've watched over a dozen interviews with witnesses who clearly saw an AA airliner. It flew right over the freeway, where people were driving slow in traffic. There's really no evidence of the truther theories, other than it "looks suspicious". Everything else points to the official story. Take care.

  • @TheDvayers

    I have no proof, but I believe there are security videos that show the plane before impact that were confiscated by the military for security perposes. I doubt there's any footage that is very clear.

    The plane didn't quite "vaporize". The heavy parts of the plane penetrated the building and were shredded by the columns and explosion. And there are photos you can look for that show quite a bit of plane debris outside of the building. There's too much evidence to be a fraud.

  • @klrdotorg You have a point about landing softly vs ramming it in,it does matter. I have seen a video of a small test plane being rammed along the ground on a rail into a concrete block and it disintegrated under lab/ideal conditions. It's just curious to me that if it vaporized on impact it could also not have punched that unusual hole in the inner ring wall at ground level. The lack of any video footage from the most secure and monitored building in the world raises questions/doubts.

  • @TheDvayers

    I was serious. How many 757's have been flown into the ground at such an angle, and with the engines gunned? None. And it's not true that every plane crash in history has shown large amounts of wreckage. I remember a crash in Florida, no trace. And Shanksville had very little wreckage - but they found unmistakable plane debris, and ID'd body parts. Again, 90+ % of the time a pilot is trying to crash as "softly" as possible, it was the opposite in this case.

  • @klrdotorg I understand what you mean but Im referring to things that don't make sense in terms of physics or expected visuals, not the possiblity of the events themselves happening. Everything you mentioned about things "found" is only per the official reports not necessarily photographic or video evidence. When they say a plane crashed somewhere you expect to see wreckage on the video or photo like you have seen in every plane crash in history. When they say it vaporized it raises an eyebrow.

  • @TheDvayers

    "... and is unusual for an airplane the size of 757 to make such a hole."

    Everything about that day was "unusual". It's unusual for a plane to fly at that speed and tradjectory into a reinforced building. They found several parts of the plane - including: seats, landing gear, engines, both "black boxes", several pieces of the fuselage, and the ID'd remains of 59 of the 64 passengers.  Hundreds of witnesses clearly saw an American Airlines passenger jet fly into Pentagon.

  • @37:45 - 38:06 Does anyone see anything resembling a crashed 757 with large aluminium, steel, titanium parts? The chopper pilot says something about airplane disintegrating but that's kinda hard to hear and/or believe. Not to mention the unusual hole at @41:20 - 41:30 that has the surrounding wall unburnt and is unusual for an airplane the size of 757 to make such a hole. Also unusual is the outer ring of the building collapsed about 20 mins after the "impact". How is that possible?

  • the explosion at the 15 minute mark??? are they insinuating that's United 93 or something at the pentagon?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more