New Atheist Arguments Against God's Existence Refuted (3 of 5)
Uploader Comments (drcraigvideos)
Top Comments
-
@iToyRobot I'm afraid you're right. This may be the closest that Craig will have in debating Dawkins. If only Dawkins had the courage to take on Craig...
Video Responses
All Comments (45)
-
William Lane Craig rocks! So glad to see God using analytic philosophy for His purpose. I'm surprised the Atheists haven't come and spammed the Dislike bar...
-
7. implausiblity does not allways translate to imposability.
8. the argument that the universe was created by a personal actor is no less gesswork than the idea that it wasn't, both use assumptions that come about from observations of our suroundings.
9. simple and complex are relative ideas, for example you claim that a mosaic is made of simple parts, however a chemist could argue that the parts are complex because of the chemical reactions required to make glass/stone ect.
-
@drcraigvideos I agree with u
-
William Lane Craig FTW.
-
I like the way he debates, he does seem pretty sincere and genuinely interested in logically demonstrating his points. I´d like to see him going head to head with the neo-atheists though. Has such a debate happened already? If so, can anyone one point me to a video of it? Thanks
-
Craig is amazing!
-
Craig is amazing!
-
@Destorath666 revision:sacrifice part of itself it does not have to be the whole of the entity
-
Isnt a universe with the existence of the god of causality a infinite one? This first cause(given that it must be uncaused) would either have to have infinite power or must sacrifice itself in order to create anything(since there is no other medium to start the universe with) so then is the first cause finite?
I disagree with Craig that "the laws of nature permit a large range of values for [Reese's fundamental constants]." The laws of nature (electromagnetism, gravity, the strong nuclear force, and the weak force) and the fundamental constants seem to be determined by the properties of physical particles (photons, gravitons, gluons, and W and Z bosons). I'm not sure what made particles have these properties, or what caused the Big Bang. But my best guess is a spontaneous quantum fluctuation.
jsoccerw87 1 year ago
@jsoccerw87 Nope: watch?v=_xAP06ykvZM
drcraigvideos 1 year ago
confusion.... the only one who is confused is Craig.... he is embarrassing to watch....
sk84life0707 1 year ago
@sk84life0707 Why not be specific and tell us what you're confused about concerning Craig? Or are you only here to do drive-by cowardly comments?
drcraigvideos 1 year ago 26
@drcraigvideos I think its another drive-by, Is anybody hurt?:)
Creationcreed 1 year ago
@Creationcreed I doubt it. But something tells me sk84life0707 is the only one hurt here. He's just too cowardly to deal with the video.
drcraigvideos 1 year ago 2