Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Constellation and SaturnV

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,146
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 26, 2008

Constellation and SaturnV
NASA - Constellation Main
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/constellation/main/

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (15)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @SongBirdIsMe This sounds odd, but its kind of a blessing in disguise. Reason, the best rocket out there "by far" for lifting people (safety and cost) is the Falcon9/Dragon. Its the only thing they can afford right now. It does everything the multi billion dollar Ares1/Orion can do and more. Lockheed & NASA (heavily lobbied by Lockheed) is trying to ram Constellation down our throats (because the need the big cash flow) when its totally not needed.

  • ....but the next Moon landing just won't be American because the US policy makers seem to be incapable of sustaining a consistent development policy for more than a few months at a time. Let's face it guys and gals, that's the American way - dither, change your minds and let others overtake your lead.

  • If constellation creators plan on 2 rockets (Ares1 and AresV) to assemble to make a moon rocket. Then I propose 8-10 small Falcon9/AtlasV flights to assemble a moon rocket at a fraction of the cost of one Ares1. We can also throw in a Delta launch (as long is its NOT one of its solid fuel strap on variants.) Falcon9 would be the most bang for the buck. I don't care if there is 3-5 small burn stages to get out of LEO. We can use ISS to help with the assembly.

  • Wait a minute! In a signed letter Buzz Aldrin stated that he did not reccomend returning to the moon. So: who slept with who to make him say this?

    By the way, Ares I sucks.

  • Manned landings again on the moon? What would we learn that we do not alreay know? A manned mission to Mars would involve a whole new list of problems that going to the moon again would not address. If we are to land humans on Mars there has to be a good reason over and above some kind of spiritual need to cross new horizons. If there are no good reason men on Mars will never happen.

  • Excellent clip! Very inspirational. Thanks for posting!

  • Money is nothing. Progress is everything.

  • Plus he has to play on the pride angle, that's like the only thing that's holding up NASA's meager budget as is. 

    If Americans can't feel pride that they are leading the way into space and all that, their government isn't going to continue throwing billions of dollars into it.

  • Sure. But think of the rewards!

  • I can understand why they stopped going to the moon, it's ALOT of money, you loose 3 stages 2 more if you include the SM and thr LEM just for this little capsule it takes alot

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more