evolution of sex

evolution Darwin sexual selection

Re. Delusional ideas of The Theory of Evolution by sablechicken

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• evolution

[Chuichupachichi]

Although Evolutionists like to tuck their tails and always claim exemption from Abiogenesis. The Carl Sagan "animation" video shows exactly why you can't have evolution without Abiogenesis. Or are we to believe that God simply created single cell organisms and left it at that. But that was the only thing the Sagan "cartoon" showed. Since it was comprised of pure unsupported "THEORY".

Whats not theory, is that bacteria are the most proficient life form on earth. Have to b a fool 2 believe in Evo!

[Ishta5]

you confuse the word with the theory. the theory of evolution is only one thing. it is an explanation of an observation. It explain why and how animals change. If you want to talk about other things that evolve, it is not in that theory but other theories. the fact that organisms evolve is an observed fact, the theory is the explanation why they do. planets evolve but the theory of evolution is not about that fact. this one explanation only deals with the one observation

[Chuichupachichi]

Thats lame cuz apparently it was a scientific debate. If a Chemist were to propose a theory regarding monomers & synthetic & organic polymers or something like that. Then, if when others present arguments based on scientific facts against his theory. Of what relevance would it be if the Chemist replied with "The blue Hindu god can't really have 6 arms"? Your generalization of that Creationists only argue that "God did it" is so childish. I & many others never say that within a scientific context

[Chuichupachichi]

(Could I fairly say that Christians like to tuck their tails and claim exemption by saying "GOD DID IT"?) No, you can't fairly say that, for several reasons. First, because the religion of Christianity is not claimed by anyone to be science but Evo is. Another "tail tucking" that Evoists commonly do, is that when a scientific argument against Evo is presented. Evoists often times fail to address it directly and instead resort to replying with "Well, you can't prove Magic Daddy in the sky".

[Chuichupachichi]

However, the reality is evident within our exchange of comments. The reason why you insult with accusations of ignorance, even right within your very argument which I have just revealed to be illogically dunce. Is because your minds are already conditioned to work that way. Conditioned to believe falsely about people of the opposing view. As well as conditioned to work in illogical ways. Thats because Evo is false. So theres no way to present it as fact without including deception or illogic

[Chuichupachichi]

Your explanation about exemption from abio is illogical. You claim that the distinction is made because Creationists are supposedly ignorant of the difference between abio & evo. But that implies that the distinction is already made and thats what Creationists are misunderstanding. Therefor, the Evoists are forced to make the distinction? See, you guys are under the delusion of that all the logic & reasoning resides in your heads. Meanwhile, Creationists have never produced a logical thought

[Chuichupachichi]

Only micro Evo is part of biology. Macro evo is not. You may believe that it is but there isn't any conclusive evidence to support that view. "Evolutionist" identifies one who subscribes to evolutionary theory. Since not all people and scientists do, is why the word is used to make the distinction. You use the word "Creationist" but if Evolution is not a "movement", then even less is Creationism a movement. Considering its been around in modern societies alot longer than a mere 150 years.

[Chuichupachichi]

AAA

[redvision350]

"Evolutionist" is a misnomer. Evolution is a part of biology just like cell anatomy is, not some movement you creationists make it to be.

No one tucks their tails to claim exemption from abiogenesis. The reason why such a distinction must be made is because more and more commonly creationists/christians refuse to properly educate themselves on the topic, so we are forced to do it for you. Could I fairly say that Christians like to tuck their tails and claim exemption by saying "GOD DID IT"?

[arcanics1971]

So..are you deliberately misunderstanding or are you genuinely stupid?