Re: final Proof of Evolution Disproved

GoodScienceForYou is wrong, and here is why

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• evolution
• radiometric
• dating
• goodscienceforyou
• is
• wrong
• joegocal
• fallacy

[ChickenHawk110]

Well, its been a while now since I last posted to Jimmy. I have tolerated all I can tolerate from Jimmy our GSFY genius teachers teacher.

I will compile a collection of my favourite quotes from Jimmy, in order of his videos. Some of these quotes are intensly ironic, for all the ppl who have experienced the manner in which Jimmy discusses his teachings.

Vid 1. Learn How To Learn Science HEMGGOOD1A:

"Actually I have the equivelent of Ph D in several subjects"

"A closed mind is a disease"

[joegocal]

he's stopped trying to play science and started making music about trying to play science... if anyone thinks im going to debunk a song, they're nuts.

[hogtiechamp]

Funny... I busted him on Mistake #3 in his Comments section. "Radiation dating"?? I asked him what TYPE or SOURCE of radiation they relied on -- he had no clue what I was asking.

When I pointed out that he should learn about the different forms of "radiometric dating" in use, he said something like, "We used to call it 'radiation dating' and I'm not going to use modern terms now!" Really?? Suuuuure that's the old name for it! *laugh*

[joegocal]

right... "hey jim... throw some argon-40 radiation in there lets see how old this shit is [long pause] enough with your HEMG shut the fuck up we just use radiation."

I have my serious doubt any scientist ever actually used the word radiation dating because radiation means a completely different thing than radiometric.

[pewpewlasergunz]

"The fact that we have "nylon eating bacteria" should be evidence against evolution, because if it eats nylon a very hard to digest carbon based naturally organic compound it can digest all of the Carbon containing matter in a bone." - GSFY

Who missed this fucking GEM?! unless I'm missing something huge here, but isn't Nylon the purely synthetic polymer first produced in 1935? surely this would be evidence FOR evolution as I'm pretty sure there was no nylon in the garden of eden.

[joegocal]

yeah, theres a lot of those

[circusOFprecision]

Sorry, but this in no way does this refute the point he made. In fact, it helped me understand his points even stronger. The fact that there were billions of animals means we should have more fossils that show direct evidence of evolution. We don't. Radiometric dating doesn't date the animal, but the minerals that replaced the organic material that made the animal, hence it's basically dating dirt. Dogma is a bitch isn't it, it's stuck in your brain. You'll defend it even though it's illogical.

[smileyking96]

Stating that just because you dig into the ground and don't find a fossil doesn't disprove evolution, or state that fossils are not common. The earth's crust is pretty big, and fossilization often occurs in places where the mineral content in rocks are high, such as deep underground, or the sea floor. Coal? Dead animal/plant matter. Oil? Same. Get the picture creationists?

[Barkeroni]

Well done, unlike GSFY that posts videos that cannot be rated. I cant get enough of this bullshit coming out of a 60 year old that is so clueless...

[208697]

i was gonna try to humor this and watch it but once i saw the quote from wikipedia there is no more hope. sir or madam u are a blight upon this world, the cure? bullet in a gun

[joestfrancois]

Completely wrong on the Crick, look it up from a non-creationist source. To continue misrepresenting him thus is a lie.

" Anymore most evolutionists I speak to disregard the primordial soup theory and say a feasible theory will pop up soon" What? This is crap, means nothing without references.

"shy away form facts or make up new theories to "buy time" I don't do this or observe it. I think you talk a lot but have little to say.

I don't think you believed in evolution.

[Marineforgod2016]

@joestfrancois Who is the judge of what is true and false? This is what I love about human will; we can each have our own opinions and discuss them! It is just absolutely amazing. Also I've observed that most people (evolutionists and creationists) try to shy away form facts or make up new theories to "buy time". I believe this is human nature, everyone wants to be right! I'll be honest I am biased, as all people are, but not nearly as much as most; as I was an evolutionist once.

[Marineforgod2016]

@joestfrancois Francis Crick is one, although he is not of this current generation he was still active in the 80's and maybe even in the 90's. (I remember reading about a French evolutionist who regards it as absurd as; well I'll get back to you when his name is remembered). Anymore most evolutionists I speak to disregard the primordial soup theory and say a feasible theory will pop up soon... How soon? And how is my statement false? I was referring to the primordial soup theorem.

[joestfrancois]

@Marineforgod2016

"Many leading evolutionists who actually LOOK at the data and perform UNBIASED experiments realize that there is no way in an infinite amount of time that this will happen"

This statement is completely false, name one "leading evolutionist", not many as you claim, just name one. In fact, it is so demonstrably false that is becomes obvious it is manufactured, in short, a lie.

These lies work on the ignorant and the wilfully ignorant and that is about it.

[Marineforgod2016]

@joestfrancois Also I believe in Micro Evolution 100% because there IS EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT IT!!! The same cannot be said of macro evolution. There is just no conclusive evidence... And this video is fairly lame I'll give you that.

[Marineforgod2016]

@joestfrancois No I am not.. And what I have never disrespected an Evolutionist with said "Ad Hominum" attacks, as I realize they do not clarify anything and they make the attacker look like a fool. A hint of truth? Many leading evolutionists who actually LOOK at the data and perform UNBIASED experiments realize that there is no way in an infinite amount of time that this will happen. The whole idea of evolution is a prime example of Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc.