It was OUT!!

:::::::::::::Ravi:::::::::::::::::::::;;

Uthappa was way away from the stumps when the stumps were broken by Sreesanth. In fact Uthappa's legs appear only after the stumps were broken. Your allegations were completely baseless and is based on hearsay. In fact Taufel had a good view and only after he was convinced he gave it out. It was neither a mistake or anything, India deserved to win the game and Pakistan lost it. It's as simple as that.

:::::::::::::Ravi:::::::::::::::::::::;;

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• cricket
• india
• pak
• world
• twenty20

[massivesurfboard]

@abhimamc09

You are incorrect. Read Law 28 - 1.(v), which clearly states the wicket has to be broken by the hand, or arm of the hand, which is holding the ball (either arm can break the wicket if the ball is held in both hands together). By the way, what decision did the umpire give, because it seems Sreesanth broke the wicket with his foot (12 seconds). DId he give him out?

[hamidaliraja]

ppl who know cricket can see that he hit the stupms with his foot first; so it was not out. also it seems he even didnt touch the ball with the wicket. i must say unlucky india

[hamidaliraja]

ppl who know cricket can see that he hit the stupms with his foot first; so it was not out. also it seems he even didnt touch the ball with the wicket.

[Christopha33]

Im confused... how on earth would this be a safe? The bail was struck of by the fielder when the batsman was not past the line. And just putting this out, Go Australia :)

[Shappers87]

Not out! if you pause it at around 0:12 the bails are off and he hasn't hit the stumps with the ball! Anyway can't change the decision now!

[KILL4N4IN]

SAFE! NOT OUT!

[kalpentllc]

agree with abhimanc09 ...its out!!

[cantworkitout]

lol, it's funny cause at 0:12 you can clearly see the bails leaving the stumps before the ball is anywhere near it... he didn't uproot a stump after he kicked the bails off, therefore it's not out, lucky break for the pakis, tough luck for the indians

[razzletastic]

The right decision would be not out. The wicket was broken before the ball in hand got there. In that circumstance the wicket is considered down. To effect a run out thereafter a stump needs to be removed from the ground. This is clearly stated in the laws of teh game.

As no stumps were removed the wicket was broken illegally before the ball so not out is the right decision.

[ahmedjamal786]

pakistan won this match