World In Action - Mick Jagger - 1967 - Part One of Two
Top Comments
All Comments (35)
-
@ChadTRex I appreciate the comment, and I do agree with you. Because I wasn't alive at the time it is hard to judge, because I only listen to what was good at the time, but I'm sure there was a lot of crap like today. Perhaps it is me personally, but I find the 'good' stuff of back then, much better than the 'good' of today.
-
@kanumbra Don't take this personally, but people who say things like that tend to have a limited scope of music. There's been a lot of great music since the sixties. And let's not forget that most of the music on the charts in the sixties was bland commercial pop masquerading as something else, just like today.
-
Keith Richards has more brains than Jagger. He is the one who should be interviewed. He could've verbally destroyed all those old fogeys.
-
One invariably gets drawn into controversy, Mr. Jagger, doesn't one?
-
@Jennysmandolin Well, no one's perfect,
-
@kschoeck One of them, Rees-Mogg, was the writer for the Times who wrote the article questioning the Stones harsh sentence and influenced the court to dimiss Keith's 1 yr. sentence & Mick's was shortened.
-
The main reason artists from the 60's are so iconic and intriguing is that they were ground-breakers. They smashed social barriers. They exposed the repressive, hypocritical morals of the previous generations. They liberated youth. We all owe a huge debt of gratitude to the likes of the Stones, for the freedoms we now take for granted. This is what makes 60's music so vital - in a way that present-day music can never be.
-
@Sirscorps He took too much valium
-
If today's artists had "Brains Like Jagger" instead of his moves the radio would be so much nicer to listen to...
-
Is Mick high?
Jagger is hot
boazyu 1 year ago 11
jagger is hot
michelleleawaldrop 1 year ago 10