UK's Supreme Court Opens For Business
Loading...
Loading...
5,201
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 2:292010 Grammy Wrapby W0RLDNEWS178,685 views
- 2:26Tsunami Warnings After Deadly Chile Quakeby W0RLDNEWS4,301 views
- 2:32Making laws: Where do laws come from? (part 1 o...by UKParliament12,040 views
- 11:32Mock Ecocide Trial, UK Supreme Court London, 30...by wizardroman442 views
- 1:06Stabbing Death Nine-Year-Old Boy Named Jackson ...by W0RLDNEWS1,121 views
- 3:20Inside the Supreme Courtby eugrcants1,794 views
- 0:37Victory for Geert Wilders: Court Overturns Ban ...by 1001Phoenix2,315 views
- 0:20Jesus Christ Was Gay - Sir Elton John Says In I...by W0RLDNEWS9,159 views
- 10:31Adams addresses supreme courtby rikeihei70,521 views
- 0:41Mac UK - Courtby Whyyoullloveamac149,340 views
- 0:25UK gets a new Supreme Courtby wjr1ftkt902 views
- 3:42Last footage from Laurel & Hardy ever! In 1956!by klukhuhntje873,200 views
- 2:21Change in UK Pre-Nups Lawby videoScribble565 views
- 15:00Mock Ecocide Trial, UK Supreme Court London, 30...by wizardroman124 views
- 0:21Microchiping the population is not a theory, it...by And2theRepublic180,178 views
- 7:42Opening of UK Supreme Courtby CSPAN11,997 views
- 4:218.8 Quake Hits Chile, Three minutes of Shakingby W0RLDNEWS261 views
- 17:40Prince William And Kate's First Interview Since...by skynews2,373,192 views
- 1:57Prince William and Kate meet Steven Spielberg -...by periwinklepopsicle5,161 views
Lovely Video!
pathetic321 9 months ago
Charles Dickens...
“The one great principle of English law is to make business for itself”.
teabag3339 1 year ago
Probably not because that doesn't sound like a case that would be appealed from the English criminal and civil courts, it also doesn't sound like it would be of any constitutional importance.
Oh, and I doubt most Native American's would be ill-educated enough to sue Britain considering that Britain agreed not to expand beyond the Appalachian Mountains in order to preserve Native lands.
Apachecatdog 1 year ago
Watch
youtube ' child stealing by the state' Brian Gerrish
common purpose
find out the truth they want to keep hidden from you,
all a LIB/LAB/CON
UKDirtySecret 2 years ago
Completely agree. All part of Blair's toxic legacy. He had no idea what he was doing, no knowledge of history, just some vague manifesto pledge to reform the House of Lords, which meant he felt compelled to rearrange a constitution he didn't understand on the back of an envelope. We will be paying the price for the last 13 years of New Labour for many years to come.
harryj79 2 years ago
Really? There was 12 Lords of Appeal in Ordinary, and there is 12 members of the supreme court.
delacaravanio 2 years ago
First of all there is only 9 law lords, not 12.
The court of appeal has more than 3 Judges, it just that 3 sit on cases. As the HoL hears fewer and more important cases it needs to have a variation in the number of Judges fielded. Sometimes it is only 3, sometimes the full nine. But always an odd number.
Ohyewildthong 2 years ago
In that very case, nine law lords sat, out of twelve, and the decision split 6-3. If twelve law lords had sat who is to say that the decision could not have been a tie, or different majority completely owing to a larger number of voices?
If the Court of Appeal can operate smoothly with three judges, then the Supreme Court should be well able to function with five.
delacaravanio 2 years ago
Yes but it allows a greater amount of views and a larger number is important in some cases such as Holley
Ohyewildthong 2 years ago
Could seven judges not handle the workload or, for that matter, five?
delacaravanio 2 years ago