MF75: Cubics and the prettiest theorem in calculus
Loading...
475
views
Loading...
Uploader Comments (njwildberger)
see all
All Comments (13)
-
There is a typo on page 5 (@13:40) at the example: it should be T(1, 1) p = 8 - 8(alpha)
-
Does the disjoint tangent conic theorem carry up to any higher degree polynomials?
-
You have a beautiful handwriting, which is one of the rarest things in mathematicians. Besides, you are very talented at explaining things and speak clearly. All in all, you are an excellent instructor.
-
Amazing result. Very elegant.
Loading...
When you have to solve the cubic equation for (r-x) couldn't that
lead to an irrational value for r?
richiedon100 1 month ago
@richiedon100 It is better to say: we cannot necessarily solve for r-x. But when we can, there is at most one solution---that is the key point. Irrational values/numbers don't really exist. A modern mirage!
njwildberger 1 month ago
@njwildberger I've heard you briefly mention sqrt2 and sqrt3. And what about
pi. Don't we need that for volume and area problems? So I'm still a bit confused
by irrationals.
richiedon100 1 month ago
@richiedon100 Don't worry, the confusion with pi and related so called irrational numbers is a widespread phenomenon. This year I will try to clarify some of the issues in this series.
njwildberger 1 month ago
Very nice - so this leads us to the idea of polarity?
Toxie207 1 month ago
@Toxie207 I think the idea of polarity is more closely hinted at by the last video on Line and parabolas II. However it is a very important notion that I will be talking about at some length in the future.
njwildberger 1 month ago