The "Gen 4" car is a 2000+ Taurus (I think it is a 2001) with the V8 driveline from 96 - 99 installed, it is from Spencer, MA. The Silver Gen 3 is from Nashville, TN.
@ceadoangelus actually its completely fair, put a stock v6 sho against a stock v8 sho and the v6 would smash it, 3rd gen sho's were a complete failure, especially with the terrible cam problem, plus with no manual tranny its no fun to drive
@kmart7843 Primarily because the third gen has NO after-market. If they made everything for the third gen that they do for the first and second gen the third gen would dog stomp the first and second. So comparing a gen three to any other sho is unfair at best.
@ceadoangelus actually its completely fair, put a stock v6 sho against a stock v8 sho and the v6 would smash it, 3rd gen sho's were a complete failure, especially with the terrible cam problem, plus with no manual tranny its no fun to drive
kmart7843 10 months ago
@kmart7843 Primarily because the third gen has NO after-market. If they made everything for the third gen that they do for the first and second gen the third gen would dog stomp the first and second. So comparing a gen three to any other sho is unfair at best.
ceadoangelus 10 months ago
Yeah, but that v8 sure sounds good with flowmasters revving at 7 plus gran.
dannymetro1 2 years ago
V6 SHO > V8 SHO. High 15s = weak dude.
gumper1986 3 years ago
Gen 3's are weak
kmart7843 3 years ago
Not to mention that's a shit track...
ShoToonz 3 years ago
the tec ran a 15.8@90 in very similar conditions. very hot and humid. I must say tho, the nesho g4 did get one heck of a jump
24vsable 4 years ago
Yeah... with 95 degree, high-humidity July air. Give it a rest...
Jarrod04 4 years ago
?? timing and scoring said high 15's.....I knew the sable should have been taken to the convention
24vsable 4 years ago
it is probably equal to 14.9 or 14.8
shonzy7 4 years ago