This Year's Model

An increase in Solar Irradiance HAS NOT caused global warming.
So, what has?? That's the question.

Sea levels are going up TWICE as fast as 50 years ago. Atmospheric CO2 is going up TWICE as fast as 50 years ago.
Greenland ice sheet calving is occurring TWICE as fast as it was 10 years ago.
Do you see a pattern???
I'll bet you don't.
Duhh???

See YouTubes:
Polar Ice Update
/watch?v=MozcU7woNNQ

Fire and Ice: Permafrost Melt Spews Combustible Methane
/watch?v=1liqk9UQNAQ

TRAA pt 1
The disinformation machine churns out more lies.

'.., theCO2 data from 1 co2 monitoring Station on Mauna Loa'

I found 19 unique CO2 monitoring stations from CDIAC, not the ONE claimed by TRAA troll!

Scripps Institution of Oceanography Monitoring Sites
Alert, NWT, Canada [1]; Barrow, Alaska; La Jolla Pier; Baja California; Sur, Mexico; Mauna Loa, Hawaii [2]; Cape Kumukahi; Christmas Island; Cape Matatula, Samoa; Kermadec Islands; Baring Head; South Pole, Antarctica [3]

TRAA pt 2

CO2 monitoring stations continued

CSIRO GASLAB Flask Sampling Network
Alert, NWT, Canada; Cape Ferguson, Australia; Cape Grim, Australia; Casey, Antarctica; Estevan Point, BC, Canada; Macquarie Island, Australia; Mauna Loa, Hawaii; Mawson, Antarctica; Shetland Islands, Scotland; South Pole, Antarctica

Was TRAA being honest? Is nineteen CO2 monitoring stations equal to one? According to TRAA it is!

I am helping Boyscouts with an energy merit badge and would like to get a copy of your video of the climate model. Is there a way to get a copy of this?

I want to tie in energy usage with global warming

jeffgreen11

You could try the free Moyea FLV downloader, there's also the free FLV viewer.

Further more the most famous Average GLobal Tempature v.s. Average Estimated WOlrd CO2 concentration(As in they don't know and haven't verified the real amount) is based on about 40 weather station vs the CO2 data from 1 co2 monitoring Station on Mauna Loa

Hardly the "wide and numourous samples" needed for verification of a hyupothisis but enough to astaablish a hypothisis as worth further looking into...which the real Scientist are still doing while the Political activist say "It's Settled"

Well, because Average global Tempature...that is adding up a bunch of waether stations' daily tempature for the year and averaging them out, has absolutely nothing to do with the heat sinks or heat distribution,let alone weather,elevation and precipitation or geography (what makes climate) it a moot point to even bother with them fucking up where they stuck the tempature gauge (may as well be up there ass)

Svante said doubling Co2 should raise AGT 3c-12c...it never has, the theory is busted

OK, so rather than calling me a troll, why don't you just answer my question.

Explain to me how a model taking volcano eruptions into account is relevant in this context.

Fact is, you can't. That's because it's not relevant at all.

This video gives the illusion that climate models are the best thing since sliced bread. I'm a statistician by trade, this does not impress me.

andharvey8

Read my previous post, troll.

If you don't understand:
a) learn to read
b) Read about models
c) /watch?v=XyOHJa5Vj5Y