Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Does PG&E Want To Screw San Francisco? Opposes Clean Energy

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
6,221
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 9, 2008

http://www.zennie62.com -- Does PG&E wanto to screw San Francisco? If you consider that the utility doesn't back using clean energy sources and has not met State of California guidelines for renewable energy, it sure seems so. You can change that with the passage of Proposition H - "Yes on H." It's the first initiative of its kind; tell your friends around America about it and have them call friends in San Francisco and tell them to vote "Yes On H".

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (14)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Problem is there simply is not enough land in California, much less the bay area, to even get close to achieving that goal.

    PG&E primary responsibility is to power homes and makes sure that when you flick the switch you have power. Fairy dust, I mean solar and wind, might sound good and clean but it cannot replace Natural Gas and Nuclear Power.

    Does PG&E Want To Screw San Francisco? No, actually San Francisco wants to screw itself.

  • Its happening again. This about a court order that San Francisco mandate a MUD or municipal Utility District. The dirty tricksters are at it again with an initiative just filed requiring all municipalities to have a 2/3's vote in regards to MUD. Don't let them get away with this and it is time for the grass roots to arm itself against a utility mandated change to our constitution.

  • Cute commercial, but why not a little information, you or the commercial are not making any sense. To get to 100% clean energy is going to be impossible, so what happens if it is impossible, SF just goes dark, is that your plan?

  • what is the cost? how does this differ with the states clean energy proposal...if both are passed, will they need to be amended?

  • I will, I have 2 friends, I will forward this to them and follow up with a phone call!

  • I am stating the obvious when I say that it is reasonable to connect National Security to the importation of oil from the Middle East. Therefore it is in the National interest to commit funds and effort toward the strategy of developing an energy mix that weans the US off imported oil by a target date. There is also no disagreement about the effect the burning of fossil fuels on air quality and the related impact on health.

  • another great one zennie!

    so how to we petition or protest pg and e

    ?

  • They talk abour PG&E in this interview towards the end.

    Which says that PG&E use natural gas.

  • This we will not be held hostage to foreign states who will cut of the supply that our whole nation desperately needs. This is a amazing technology. Ron Cole from Ukiah, California is the demonstrater.

    Zinnie you yourself can help out from your strong pull within your own community.A spokesman to help out in this extraordinary land.

    PG&E could probably find a way to run there own plants with this,sewage.

  • Not just clean energy inexpensive energy.

    Like MagneGas, made from sewage waste with a electric plasma carbon arc.

    watch?v=Wy0WXkj1Drw

    Who needs to drill and take the money and time to manufacture and transport when the fuel can made locally within a few hours.(250 GAL every 24 hr for this very small, towed plant) Car dealerships who sell light compressed gas cars can have there own stations to provide fuel.Or have municipality's have all there fleet run from MagneGas.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more