Double trouble for atheists

In their attempts to discredit creation science; atheistic evolutionists unwittingly trap themselves in a dilemma. If creation science is based on revelation, then it is right, and evolution is wrong. On the other hand, if creation science is based on the writings of men, then it is a legitimate human observation and conclusion that deserves to be scrutinized in the field of science.

• Category

  Education

[creationinsights]

I am tired of correcting you and doing your homework.

3 You failed to ask the question of how the “supernatural is indistinguishable from the imaginary,” so there was nothing to address. However, I have addressed this point many times. Please refer to my web site creation insights for an explanation. Several articles to read include, “Is there empirical evidence for God's existence?” and “Is God the Creator?”

[creationinsights]

2 The recent redefining of evolution to not include origin of the universe and life is because evolutionists lose arguments in the face of contradicting the laws of thermodynamics, biogenesis, and probabilities. Knowing the history of science reveals the human contamination and often the insidious intent that plagues every human institution. Looks like you failed to meet your own expectations of understanding science. Please do not send me anymore boorish comments.

[creationinsights]

1 You have failed to study and understand the inclusion of the universe in evolution. I prefer not to do homework for others. But a quick search yielded a result at Oracle think quest in an article titled, ”Evolution of Universe.” Also, when introducing evolution to freshman biology students at the University, I showed I film in which Theodosius Dobzhansky defined evolution as including origin of the universe.

[creationinsights]

1 2 ??? I can’t make sense of this comment.

2 3 Intent and source are irrelevant to scientific inquiry. And let’s not lose track of the video’s point: if written by men then a conclusion of men. “In the beginning God” is a claim from the Bible regardless of one’s interpretation.

[Cafeeine]

Evolution has nothing to do with the origin of the universe, it explains the biological diversity of life on the Earth. If you fail to understand that basic fact about it, how do you expect me to believe you have any good understanding of science at all?

You failed to address the greater point, that the supernatural is indistinguishable from the imaginary, and therefore is not available as a scientific explanation.

[Cafeeine]

2 So the millions of Christian evolutionists who disagree with you are parroting challenges to the BIble? Ok, sounds like an internal problem.

3 The Bible contains several statements, but since we lack the original author's intent, we have no concrete idea what the original claims are, and whether they line up with the interpretations of its modern promoters. When I respond to e.g. your interpretation of the words, I am responding to you, not 'the bible'.

[creationinsights]

4 Explain how evolution 1) resolves its contradiction with the first & second laws of thermodynamics for origin of the universe, 2) resolves its contradiction with the law of biogenesis & probabilities for the origin of life, and 3) resolves lack of lab evidence that unlimited change is possible in organisms.

[creationinsights]

3 The law of biogenesis has already been given. Attempting to dismiss it does not make it irrelevant. Check out my creation insights web page for a good lesson on creation and the problems with evolution. You’ll get more than one example. You will also learn more about evolutionists’ recent propaganda tactics to dissociate their the origin of species theory with the origins of life and universe.

[creationinsights]

1 The law of biogenesis states: all living cells come from living cells. Check your freshman biology textbook. Cite one example, that suggests otherwise proving that the law of biogenesis has been shown wrong and does not apply to abiogenesis today.

2 Insults do not persuade. Resorting to insults serves only to reveal your fear of being shown wrong and a desperation for lack of thoughtful ideas. Try using statements with meaningful content instead of being a bully.

[creationinsights]

1 2 Your assumption is incorrect.

2 3 Actually the Bible makes many claims. “In the beginning God created….” is just one of many claims. Readers decide for themselves what to think about it. But that is true with any book. Fortunately, today we can use science to explore more about creation as well as enjoy the supportive scientific evidence that confirms the world’s origin as supernatural rather than natural.