The most destructive false teachings in Christianity

I list the most destructive false teachings (fatal lies) that are found in the apostate church.
The topics discussed in the video are:
1) The bible does not include ALL of God's written word
2) OSAS and Universalism are lies
3) The so called Gospel of Love (unconditional love) is a lie as it's taught in the church by most Christians
4) Origional sin is a lie
5) The problem with eliminating scripture and relying soley on the Holy Spirit
6) Paul is a false apostle and ravening wolf
(additional lies I run out of time to discuss)
7) Preterism
8) Many misinterpretations of prophecy (i.e. the 2 witnesses are the old and new testaments of the bible)
9) The lie that Jesus is not the son of God AND God (for he is)
10) women remaining silent in the church and unable to become pastors is a lie.

A few reasons why Paul is a false apostle:
Paul attacked the church leadership. Paul claimed to have greater understanding than the church leadership (James and Peter) when he taught that it was acceptable to eat food sacrificed to idols. I mean he actually said those people who are not hindered by the belief that it is wrong to eat food sacrificed to idols have superior knowledge to those people who have a problem with it. So Paul was saying he had superior knowledge than James and Peter whom Jesus placed in charge of the church and who he gave the keys to the kingdom to (knowledge of the kingdom).
Paul was abandoned in his later years. This is because people recognized he was a false teacher.
Paul's teachings, from wence we get OSAS and origional sin are lies and contradicted by Jesus and the true apostles.
His teachings about women having to remain silent is also a lie.
Paul distorts scripture just as satan distorted scripture.
Paul says in one sentence that sin entered through Adam. Than in another he says Eve is the one who was decieved, not Adam, and therefore women are to be subservant and remain silent.
Paul is they only one who speaks of tearing down the law.
Paul is the only one who speaks of baptising the dead.
Paul claimed he was superior to the apostles because he never brought a wife and expected people to give him food and lodging. His words are that he didn't want to be a stumbling block. So he was then saying that the apostles who did bring their wives and asked for food and lodging were in fact a stumbling block.
Paul attacked James when he tells us people who would not eat meat had a weak conscience. I say this because it was well known that James the Just was a vegetarian and would not eat meat. We know this because the historian Josephus wrote of it.
Paul attacked the Epistle of James teaching that salvation is NOT by faith alone with his counter arguement that salvation IS by faith alone.
Jesus used the prophecy from the Testament of the 12 Patiarchs to warn us of a ravening wolf from the tribe of Benjamin. The Didache warns that there would be sheep who turn into wolves. This means there would be people considered to be Christians who would turn into wolves. Paul is such a wolf.
Paul tells us in Acts 22 that he still considered himself a Pharisee. So he remained a Pharisee all through his so called Christian ministry.
Paul went against the teachings of Christ by telling people to think of him as their spiritual father.
Paul told Philemon that he actually owed him his very soul. Which is a lie.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Christian
• christianity
• God
• Jesus
• Christ
• Holy
• Spirit
• apostate
• church
• false
• Gospel
• gospels
• scripture
• bible
• apocrypha
• biblical
• canon
• prophet
• apostle
• Paul
• ravening
• wolf
• destructive
• teaching
• salvation
• kingdom
• heaven
• hell
• doctrine
• theology
• origional
• sin
• universalism
• religion
• TrustinJC
• youtube

[yuradisman]

so you rule out Paul but rule in the Apocrypha...interesting choice. As a believer from the Jewish side of the fence, having come to Christ having been raised in Judaism since I was 9, I've come to a semi-conclusion that Paul's teachings aren't false when understood in the context of Torah...the hidden parts of the Torah...but you and I do not have to agree on this, let's just keep working out our Salvation with Fear and Trembling as one body, without dissension due to interpretive differences..

[donHooligan]

greetings.



[TrustinJC]

@MessiahYeshuah Than you are drawn to the exception rather than the rule.

Water baptism preceeds baptism of the Holy Spirit.

Baptism was the last thing taught in the OT and the first thing taught in the NT. Jesus and the apostles taught the need for it.

While there are examples of people recieving some measure of the Holy Ghost without water baptism preceeding it, many of those people end up searing the Holy Ghost and forcing him to leave.

Con't

[MessiahYeshuah]

@TrustinJC I have not gone into depth on baptism, but I do know one thing that John the Baptist himself said:

I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire:

Outward, flesh immersion baptism was a shadow of the internal, Holy Ghost baptism. I do not believe that getting water baptized is necessary for salvation. 

[TrustinJC]

@ABAisSCIENCE. In addition to these are the 14 books that make up the apocrypha, which are found in the older protestant bibles. The last video I posted prior to this one I read from and gave a teaching from The Shepherd of Hermas. From it we are told that we can grieve the Holy spirit and cause it to leave us.

So the Holy spirit will not stay with people just because they cofess Christ as their lord or because they submit to water baptism.

[TrustinJC]

@ABAisSCIENCE Yes. I agree. But the Gospel of Judas is nothing like the Gospel of Thomas.

I've made a good number of video on most of those books. I have videos on the Didache, Enoch, The War Scroll, and The Gospel According to Thomas. And while I may not have made videos dealing specifically with some other books, I have referenced many and drawn from their teachings. Some examples are, The Book of Jubilees, the Damascus Scroll, and The Testament of the 12 Patriarchs.

con't

[ABAisSCIENCE]

@TrustinJC,

Well, the Gospel of Judas is useless. Some of the others on your main page I know nothing about. They may be valid, but I wouldn't know.

[TrustinJC]

@ABAisSCIENCE Seriously? Those are your arguements? Because it doesn't include things found in other gospels and because it isn't written in the same format as the other gospels you dismiss it?

you could not have read it like you say. Because if you had, you would know it has nothing to do with Paul.

The book is made up of the sayings of Christ. It has to do with his instructions, not his interaction with the public. The Didache is similar in that it has only instructions from the apostles.

[TrustinJC]

@ABAisSCIENCE Why would I take part in a discussion with someone who has already they have no desire or intention to look at the facts. The fact that you say "other text that deface God" is proof that you don't care for truth but rather just want to either argue with people who don't share your views or only seek those people who agree with you.

But if you wanted a short list you only had to look on my homepage.

[TrustinJC]

@MessiahYeshuah Yes. That's true. I've said similar things myself. We are to love like Christ and hate like Christ. Stating what you have though does nothing to refute what is said. And we must be careful that the exception to the rule is not used to water down the rule.

For many Christians do this. Some teach, for example, that baptism is not important because the thief on the cross was never baptised yet told that he'd see Christ in paradise.