Mohammad Khatami says that Iran dont want a non religous democracy

Video of unknown date.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Mohammad
• Khatami
• iran
• democracy
• islamic
• republic

[FreeSecularIran2009]

ppl need to wake up by IRI standards he is liberal but that doesnt mean he supports secularism either, the same goes for Mousavi who is actually LESS liberal than Khatami.Ofcourse he is against secularism he is a religious cleric what do u expect? Many iranian ppl can be naive that is the problem&that is how scum Khomeini got to power in 79 by fooling ppl who believed in the same pretenses atleast he makes no ambiguity about it. look for REAL secularists not reformers who are part of the IRI

[aria2209]

این پوفیوز مادر قحبه در 1378 هم با همین جاکشیش جلوی مردم رو گرفت.وگرنه الان 10 سال بود که از حکومت ننگین اسهالی آزاد شده بودیم

[bankorandotcom]

That is WAY TOO FUNNY! After trashing democracy, he makes an appeal to it by saying the majority of Iranian people don't want it! Can he even see his own hypocrisy? Too damn funny.

[monirehC]

Of Course he says that that Iran dont want a non religous democracy , BECAUSE HE DOES NOT WISHS TO LOOSE POWER.

DEATH TO THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC

[KaylDunnyan]

@Hananetje1 fine,then you better work on importing the Mullahs to your country or going to live in Iran or Saudi Arabia,because secularism is what the new generation wants,it's inevitable.

[timujin02]

He along with all the other bearded Freaks will one day be removed and executed like those shits did to the heroic supporters - generals and civilians - of HM Shahanshah Areyamehr Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. Javid Shah! Payande Iran!

[taksir01]

صنعت مکن که هر که محبت نه راست باخت ..عشقش به روی دل در معنی فراز کرد

فردا که پیشگاه حقیقت شود پدید ..شرمنده ره روی که عمل بر مجاز کرد

ای کبک خوش خرام کجا می‌روی بایست ..غره مشو که گربه زاهد نماز کرد

حافظ مکن ملامت رندان که در ازل ..ما را خدا ز زهد ریا بی‌نیاز کرد

[terry1919]

but you will murder those who will disagree with you...

The fundamentals of the religions of God are one in Reality. There is no difference in the fundamentals. The difference is caused by the imitations which arise later, and inasmuch as imitations differ, strife, discord and quarreling take place. If the religions of this time should forsake imitations and seek the fundamentals, all of them would agree and strife and discord would pass away — for Reality is one and not multiple.